Leadership Orientations of Russian Working Adults: Do Age, Gender, Education, and Government Work Experience Make a Difference?

被引:0
作者
Nguyen L.D. [1 ]
Ermasova N. [2 ]
Geyfman V. [1 ]
Mujtaba B.G. [3 ]
机构
[1] College of Business, Bloomsburg University, 400 East Second Street, Bloomsburg, 17815, PA
[2] College of Business and Public Administration, Governors State University, 1 University Parkway, University Park, 60484, IL
[3] H. Wayne Huizenga School of Business and Entrepreneurship, Nova Southeastern University, 3301 College Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, 33314, FL
关键词
Culture; Government experience; Leadership; Relationships; Russia; Tasks;
D O I
10.1007/s11115-014-0279-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Working people often have different notions and attitudes toward leadership based on cultural background and context as well as various demographic traits. This study examines the leadership orientations of 519 Russian working adults based on age, gender, education, and government work experience. It appears that they are more relationship-oriented than task-oriented. Task-oriented leadership is the preferred style in government sector. Age and gender appear to be significant factors in determining the difference of task-oriented traits as older Russian people tend to be more task-oriented than younger Russian people and Russian males are more task-oriented than Russian females. Education appears to make a difference in the relationship but not in the task scores. In this paper, Russian history, culture and leadership, as well as the behavioral approach to leadership are presented along with practical implications and suggestions for managers, practitioners and future studies. © 2014, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 413
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Ageev A., Gratchev M., Hisrich R., Entrepreneurship in the Soviet Union and Post-Socialist Russia, Small Business Economics, 7, 5, pp. 365-376, (1995)
[2]  
Ayios A., Trust and Western-Russian business relationships, (2004)
[3]  
Batchelder D., The emperor’s pot, Experiential activities for intercultural learning, pp. 85-96, (1996)
[4]  
Berliner J.S., The innovation decision in the soviet industry, (1988)
[5]  
Bollinger D., The four cornerstones and three pillars in the ‘House of Russia’ management system, Journal of Management Development, 13, 2, pp. 49-54, (1994)
[6]  
Elenkov D.S., Russian aerospace multinational companies (MNCS) in global competition: Their origin, competitive strengths and forms of expansion, Columbia Journal of World Business, 30, 2, pp. 66-78, (1995)
[7]  
Hofstede G., Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad?, Organizational Dynamics, 9, 1, pp. 42-63, (1980)
[8]  
Hofstede G., Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions, Expiscations in cross-cultural psychology, pp. 335-355, (1983)
[9]  
Hofstede G., Culture and organizations: Software of the mind, (1991)
[10]  
Hofstede G., Cultural constraints in management theories, The leader’s companion, pp. 253-270, (1993)