Role of Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in Gynecology

被引:15
作者
Turkgeldi E. [1 ]
Urman B. [1 ]
Ata B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amerikan Hospital, Koc University School of Medicine, Rumelifeneri Yolu Sarıyer, Istanbul
关键词
Congenital uterine anomalies; Gynecology; Oncology; Three-dimensional ultrasound; Urogynecology;
D O I
10.1007/s13224-014-0635-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D USG) is a fast-evolving imaging technique that holds a great potential for use in gynecology. Its sensitivity and specificity is reported to be close to 100 % for diagnosing congenital uterine anomalies, comparable with those of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and laparoscopy. With 3D USG, a coronal view of the uterus can be obtained, clearly outlining the external contour of the uterus and providing accurate information about the shape of the cavity. Although 3D USG may not perform well in thin endometria, combining it with saline infusion sonography (SIS) overcomes this problem. Research shows that 3D USG is more sensitive and specific than two-dimensional ultrasound (2D USG) in defining and mapping uterine lesions, such as fibroids, adenomyosis, and intrauterine synechia. In cases of suspected malignancy, 3D USG is mainly used in the initial evaluation of patients. Measuring various indices and mapping vascular architecture with 3D power Doppler have been proposed for evaluating adnexal masses. Although some studies raised hope, no consensus is reached about its use, success, and limitations. In urogynecology, translabial 3D USG is proved to be a valuable tool, as it provides instant access to the axial plane, which clearly depicts the relationship of the vagina, urethra, rectum, and the muscular pelvic floor. Studies report no significant differences between translabial 3D USG and MRI measurements for evaluation of the pelvic floor. In conclusion, adding 3D USG to routine gynecological workup can be beneficial for clinicians, as it provides fast and accurate results in a relatively cost-effective setting. © 2014, Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 154
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Chan Y.Y., Jayaprakasan K., Zamora J., Et al., The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review, Hum Reprod Update, 17, 6, pp. 761-771, (2011)
[2]  
Saravelos S.H., Cocksedge K.A., Li T.C., Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal, Hum Reprod Update, 14, 5, pp. 415-429, (2008)
[3]  
Chan Y.Y., Jayaprakasan K., Tan A., Et al., Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 38, 4, pp. 371-382, (2011)
[4]  
Armstrong L., Fleischer A., Andreotti R., Three-dimensional volumetric sonography in gynecology: an overview of clinical applications, Radiol Clin North Am, 51, 6, pp. 1035-1047, (2013)
[5]  
Faivre E., Fernandez H., Deffieux X., Et al., Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus compared with office hysteroscopy and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 19, 1, pp. 101-106, (2012)
[6]  
Benacerraf B.R., Shipp T.D., Bromley B., Which patients benefit from a 3D reconstructed coronal view of the uterus added to standard routine 2D pelvic sonography?, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 190, 3, pp. 626-629, (2008)
[7]  
Ghi T., Et al., Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies, Fertil Steril, 92, 2, pp. 808-813, (2009)
[8]  
Bermejo C., Martinez Ten P., Cantarero R., Et al., Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 35, 5, pp. 593-601, (2010)
[9]  
Ata B., Nayot D., Nedelchev A., Et al., Do measurements of uterine septum using three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging agree?, J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 36, 4, pp. 331-338, (2014)
[10]  
Ludwin A., Pitynski K., Ludwin I., Et al., Two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 20, 1, pp. 90-99, (2013)