Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer and the Role of Adjuvant Therapy

被引:0
作者
Valerie M. Nelson
Al B. Benson
机构
[1] Northwestern University,Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center
来源
Current Oncology Reports | 2013年 / 15卷
关键词
Rectal cancer; Adjuvant therapy; Neoadjuvant therapy; Pathologic response;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Both the addition of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and improvements in surgical techniques have improved local control and overall survival for locally advanced rectal cancer patients over the past few decades. The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy has likely improved outcomes as well, though the contribution has been more difficult to quantify. At present, the majority of resected locally advanced rectal cancer patients receive adjuvant chemotherapy, though there is great variability in this practice based on both patient and institution characteristics. Recently, questions have been raised regarding which sub-groups of patients benefit most from adjuvant chemotherapy. As pathologic complete response (pCR) is increasingly found to be a reasonable surrogate for long-term favorable outcomes, some have questioned the need for adjuvant therapy in this select group of patients. Multiple retrospective analyses have shown minimal to no benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy in this group. Indeed, the patients most consistently shown to benefit from adjuvant therapy both in terms of disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) are those who achieve an intermediate pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment. Tumors that have high expression of thymidylate synthetase have also shown to benefit from adjuvant therapy. More study is needed into clinical and molecular features that predict patient benefit from adjuvant therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 161
页数:9
相关论文
共 173 条
  • [1] Siegel R(2012)Cancer statistics CA: Cancer J Clin 62 10-29
  • [2] Naishadham D(1988)Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy for rectal cancer: results from NSABP protocol R-01 J Natl Canc Inst 80 21-9
  • [3] Jemal A(2006)Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3-4 rectal cancers: results of FFCD 9203 J Clin Oncol 24 4620-5
  • [4] Fisher B(2004)Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer New Engl J Med 351 1731-40
  • [5] Wolmark N(2006)Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer New Engl J Med 355 1114-23
  • [6] Rockette H(2009)Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial Lancet 373 821-8
  • [7] Gerard JP(2007)Adjuvant management of rectal cancer: the more we learn, the less we know J Clin Oncol 25 4339-40
  • [8] Conroy T(2013)Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy use in stage II/III rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy: a National Comphrehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Analaysis J Clin Oncol 31 30-8
  • [9] Bonnetain F(2009)Concordance with NCCN Colorectal Cancer Guidelines and ASCO/NCCN Quality Measures: an NCCN institutional analysis J Natl Compr Canc Netw 7 895-904
  • [10] Sauer R(2007)Patients with curative resection of cT3-4 rectal cancer after preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy: does anybody benefit from adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy? A trial of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiation Oncology Group J Clin Oncol 25 4379-86