Ventricular pacing site separation by cardiac computed tomography: validation for the prediction of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:0
作者
S. Modi
Raymond Yee
David Scholl
John Stirrat
Jorge A. Wong
Carmen Lydell
Vamshi Kotha
Lorne J. Gula
Allan C. Skanes
Peter Leong-Sit
David McCarty
Maria Drangova
James A. White
机构
[1] Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry,Division of Cardiology
[2] University of Western Ontario,Robarts Research Institute
[3] Libin Cardiovascular Institute,Stephenson Cardiac Imaging Centre
[4] University of Calgary,Department of Diagnostic Imaging
来源
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2017年 / 33卷
关键词
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT); Lead separation; Cardiac computed tomography; Cardiac failure; CRT response; Inter-lead distance; Left ventricular lead;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) fails to provide benefit in up to one-third of patients. Maximizing the geographic separation of right and left ventricular pacing lead sites has been suggested as one way to improve response. Cardiac CT provides an opportunity to explore 3-dimensional inter-lead distance (ILD) measures for the prediction of CRT response. The objective of this study was to investigate associations between standardized measures of ILD by cardiac CT and echocardiographic response to CRT. Forty-two consecutive patients undergoing CRT had serial clinical and echocardiographic evaluations performed in addition to a post-procedural cardiac-gated CT with blinded measurement of direct and circumferential (via the myocardium) ILD measures. Clinical response to CRT, the primary clinical outcome, was defined as a ≥15% reduction in LVESV using echocardiography at 6-months. The mean age and ejection fraction was 63.6 ± 8.9 years and 25.2 ± 7.8%, respectively. The primary outcome occurred in 35 of 42 patients (83%). Both direct and circumferential CT-based ILD measures were associated with the primary outcome by univariate analysis. Receiver Operator Characteristic analysis identified Circumferential ILD to have the strongest predictive accuracy (AUC 0.78). Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of CT-derived ILD measures was excellent. Circumferential ILD measures on cardiac CT are predictive of clinical response to CRT. Incorporation of these measures into the selection of optimal pacing targets, particularly from pre-procedural CT coronary vein imaging may be of therapeutic benefit and warrants further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:1433 / 1442
页数:9
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] Bristow MR(2004)Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure N Engl J Med 350 2140-2150
  • [2] Saxon LA(2005)The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure N Engl J Med 352 1539-1549
  • [3] Boehmer J(2002)Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure N Engl J Med 346 1845-1853
  • [4] Cleland JG(2006)The problem of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy Curr Opin Cardiol 21 20-26
  • [5] Daubert JC(2011)Risk factors for lead complications in cardiac pacing: a population-based cohort study of 28,860 Danish patients Heart Rhythm 8 1622-1628
  • [6] Erdmann E(2010)Complication rates associated with pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacements and upgrade procedures: results from the REPLACE registry Circulation 122 1553-1561
  • [7] Abraham WT(2005)Cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the CARE-HF trial Eur Heart J 26 2681-2688
  • [8] Fisher WG(2011)Cardiac resynchronization therapy is more effective in women than in men: the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) trial J Am Coll Cardiol 57 813-820
  • [9] Smith AL(2012)Targeted left ventricular lead placement to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy: the TARGET Study: a randomized, controlled trial J Am Coll Cardiol 59 1509-1518
  • [10] Birnie DH(2012)Non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging for guiding left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy J Interv Card Electrophysiol 33 27-35