Corporate social responsibility, credit rating, and private debt contracting: new evidence from syndicated loan market

被引:44
作者
Bae S.C. [1 ]
Chang K. [2 ]
Yi H.-C. [3 ]
机构
[1] College of Business Administration, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, 43403, OH
[2] College of Business, University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee, Sarasota, 34243-2025, FL
[3] McCoy College of Business Administration, Texas State University, San Marcos, 78666, TX
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Credit ratings; Loan spread; Private debt contracting;
D O I
10.1007/s11156-017-0630-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examine the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on loan spreads of syndicated bank loans, with a particular interest in how CSR and credit ratings are interrelated as a joint determinant of loan spreads. Focusing on private debt contracts, we show that both CSR strengths and concerns are related to their loan spreads. CSR strengths work to lower firm risk, hence reducing the loan spread, whereas CSR concerns increase firm risk, thus increasing the loan spread. Once we include detailed credit rating information in the models, however, CSR concerns lose significance, but CSR strengths remain significantly related to the loan spread. We also find that both CSR strengths and CSR concerns are related to loan spread for non-rated firms, but the CSR concern effect is stronger than the CSR strength effect for these firms. A further test shows that firm risk measured by stock return volatility plays as a direct channel through which a firm’s CSR activities affect loan spreads, whose result lends further support to our main results. Overall, our results provide strong evidence that CSR matters to the pricing of loan contracts beyond credit rating information and the results remain robust to the possible firm size effect and the endogeneity issues. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 299
页数:38
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Angbazo L., Mei J., Saunders A., Credit spreads in the market for highly leveraged transaction loans, J Bank Financ, 22, pp. 1249-1282, (1998)
[2]  
Arena M., The corporate choice between public debt, bank loans, traditional private debt placements, and 144A debt issues, Rev Quant Financ Acc, 36, 3, pp. 391-416, (2011)
[3]  
Attig N., El Ghoul S., Guedhami O., Suh J., Corporate social responsibility and credit ratings, J Bus Ethics, 117, pp. 679-694, (2013)
[4]  
Bae S.C., Chang K., Yi H.C., The impact of corporate social responsibility activities on corporate financing: a case of bank loan covenants, App Econ Lett, 23, pp. 1234-1237, (2016)
[5]  
Baird P.L., Geylani P.C., Roberts J.A., Corporate social and financial performance re-examined: industry effects in a linear mixed model analysis, J Bus Ethics, 109, pp. 367-387, (2012)
[6]  
Barnea A., Rubin A., Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders, J Bus Ethics, 97, pp. 71-86, (2010)
[7]  
Baron D.P., Harjoto M.A., Hoje J., The economics and politics of corporate social performance, Bus Politics, 13, pp. 1-48, (2011)
[8]  
Berger A., Udell G., Relationship lending and lines of credit in small firm finance, J Bus, 68, pp. 351-381, (1995)
[9]  
Boutin-Dufresne F., Savaria P., Corporate social responsibility and financial risk, J Invest, 13, pp. 57-66, (2004)
[10]  
Cai Y., Jo H., Pan C., Vice or virtue? The Impact of corporate social responsibility on executive compensation, J Bus Ethics, 104, pp. 159-173, (2011)