Spatial estimation methods for mapping corn silage and grain yield monitor data

被引:0
作者
Jason B. Cho
Joseph Guinness
Tulsi P. Kharel
S. Sunoj
Dilip Kharel
Erasmus K. Oware
Jan van Aardt
Quirine M. Ketterings
机构
[1] Cornell University,Department of Animal Science
[2] Cornell University,Department of Statistics and Data Science
[3] University at Buffalo,Department of Geology
[4] Rochester Institute of Technology,Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science
来源
Precision Agriculture | 2021年 / 22卷
关键词
Corn silage; Corn grain; Yield monitors; Yield mapping; Spatial estimation methods;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Harvester-mounted yield monitor systems are increasingly used to document corn (Zea mays L.) yield. The three most commonly used spatial estimation methods to convert point data gathered with yield monitors to regular, grid-based, raster maps include nearest neighbor (NN), inverse distance weighting (IDW) and kriging. Seven spatial estimation methods (NN, IDW using 10, 20, 30 and all data points and kriging with exponential and Matérn covariance functions) were evaluated to determine the method that most accurately captures intra-field spatial variability of corn silage and corn grain yield in New York. Yield monitor data from two dairy farms and two grain operations were cleaned using Yield Editor prior to spatial analyses. The dataset included 7–10 years of data per farm for a combined 7484 ha (245 fields) of silage and 6971 ha (253 fields) of grain. Data were split into training (80%) and cross-validation datasets (remaining 20% of the data). Normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) was used to evaluate the accuracy of the spatial estimation methods. Kriging with the Matérn covariance function resulted in the most accurate corn silage and grain yield raster maps both at the farm and field level. There were statistically significant differences in NRMSE between kriging with the Matérn isotropic covariance function and all other models for both corn silage and grain, regardless of field size, year when data were obtained or farm that supplied the data. These results are beneficial to ensure accurate and precise spatial mapping of yield products toward optimized corn growth management.
引用
收藏
页码:1501 / 1520
页数:19
相关论文
共 134 条
  • [1] Anderson-Cook CM(2002)Differentiating soil types using electromagnetic conductivity and crop yield maps Soil Science Society of America Journal 66 1562-1570
  • [2] Alley MM(2002)An evaluation of the response of yield monitors and combines to varying yields Precision Agriculture 3 107-122
  • [3] Roygard JKF(2007)Analyzing the effects of climate variability on spatial pattern of yield in a maize–wheat–soybean rotation European Journal of Agronomy 26 82-91
  • [4] Khosla R(2015)Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 Journal of Statistical Software 67 1-48
  • [5] Noble RB(2015)Profit maps for precision agriculture Ciencia e investigación agraria 42 305-330
  • [6] Doolittle JA(2015)Evaluating methods for spatial mapping: Applications for estimating ozone concentrations across the contiguous United States Environmental Technology & Innovation 3 1-10
  • [7] Arslan S(2018)Comparison of GIS-based interpolation methods for spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 17 114-126
  • [8] Colvin T(1999)Remedial correction of yield map data Precision Agriculture 1 53-66
  • [9] Basso B(2000)The interpretation of trends from multiple yield maps Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 26 37-51
  • [10] Bertocco M(2005)Defining yield-based management zones for corn-soybean rotations Agronomy Journal 97 1115-1128