A Trial of the Five Es: A Referent Model for Constructivist Teaching and Learning

被引:0
|
作者
Naomi Boddy
Kevin Watson
Peter Aubusson
机构
[1] University of Western Sydney,
[2] University of Technology,undefined
来源
Research in Science Education | 2003年 / 33卷
关键词
constructivism; elementary science; higher-order thinking; science learning; teaching strategies;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The science and technology education literature indicates that teaching within a constructivist paradigm is an effective way to promote student learning. Despite this, most primary school teachers do not use constructivist theoretical approaches because they are perceived as difficult and impractical to implement. To promote constructivist teaching and learning approaches in schools, teachers need access to models and strategies they can implement effectively and with relative ease. A unit of work was developed, based on the Five Es model (Engagement, Exploration, Explanation, Elaboration and Evaluation), and taught to a year 3 class. Ten students were participants in the study and became the sample. Data were analysed using two different methods to compare and validate findings. The unit of work, based on the Five Es model, was found to be interesting and fun by students, and motivated student learning and promoted student higher-order thinking.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 42
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Reflections on the Efficacy of a Constructivist Approach to Teaching and Learning in a First-Year Bachelor of Environmental Management Topic
    Szili, Gertrude
    Sobels, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 35 (04) : 499 - 512
  • [22] Constructivist Teaching-Learning Environment Generator System based on Learning Objects (AMBAR): multiple discipline interaction in e-learning environments
    Gertrudis Lopez, Maria
    Miguel, Vanessa
    Elena Montano, Nora
    RED-REVISTA DE EDUCACION A DISTANCIA, 2008, (19):
  • [23] The constructivist learning environments model enhancing cognitive flexibility for higher education: validation phase
    Kwanjai, Deejring
    Sumalee, Chaijaroen
    4TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES (WCES-2012), 2012, 46 : 3764 - 3770
  • [24] Teaching Sustainability Using an Active Learning Constructivist Approach: Discipline-Specific Case Studies in Higher Education
    Hedden, Maria Kalamas
    Worthy, Roneisha
    Akins, Edwin
    Slinger-Friedman, Vanessa
    Paul, R. C.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (08):
  • [25] PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING: A TEACHING AND LEARNING MODEL FOR ORGANIZATION THEORY
    Affeldt, Fabricio Sobrosa
    Fernandez, Fabio Ferraz
    REVISTA IBERO-AMERICANA DE ESTUDOS EM EDUCACAO, 2018, 13 : 436 - 450
  • [26] Study on College English Teaching Model based on Autonomous Learning
    Zong, Yani
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 4TH INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, SOCIAL SCIENCE, ARTS, SPORTS AND MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (IEESASM 2016), 2016, 22 : 1138 - 1141
  • [27] Learning Behavior Evaluation Model and Teaching Strategy Innovation by Social Media Network Following Learning Psychology
    Yuan, Lijuan
    Li, Hongming
    Fu, Shiman
    Zhang, Zizai
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [28] Understanding the complexity of young children 's learning and development in science: A twofold methodological model building on constructivist and cultural-historical strengths
    Fragkiadaki, Glykeria
    Fleer, Marilyn
    Ravanis, Konstantinos
    LEARNING CULTURE AND SOCIAL INTERACTION, 2021, 28
  • [29] Emerging Digital Transformation Model for Teaching Strategies to the Achievement of Meaningful Learning in Education 4.0
    Del Castillo Castro, Consuelo Ivonne
    Chunga Pajares, Luis Alberto
    Chaman Cabrera, Lucia Isabel
    Saavedra Diaz, Silvia Juana
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH BRAZILIAN TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM (BTSYM 21): EMERGING TRENDS IN HUMAN SMART AND SUSTAINABLE FUTURE OF CITIES, VOL 1, 2023, 207 : 314 - 321
  • [30] Model-based teaching and learning about inheritance in third-grade science
    Cisterna, Dante
    Forbes, Cory T.
    Roy, Ranu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2019, 41 (15) : 2177 - 2199