The impact of target positioning error and tumor size on radiobiological parameters in robotic stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors

被引:0
作者
Takeshi Takizawa
Satoshi Tanabe
Hisashi Nakano
Satoru Utsunomiya
Madoka Sakai
Katsuya Maruyama
Shigekazu Takeuchi
Toshimichi Nakano
Atsushi Ohta
Motoki Kaidu
Hiroyuki Ishikawa
Kiyoshi Onda
机构
[1] Niigata Neurosurgical Hospital,Department of Radiation Oncology
[2] Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences,Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology
[3] Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital,Department of Radiation Oncology
[4] Niigata University Graduate School of Health Sciences,Department of Radiological Technology
[5] Niigata Neurosurgical Hospital,Department of Neurosurgery
来源
Radiological Physics and Technology | 2022年 / 15卷
关键词
Stereotactic radiosurgery; CyberKnife; Dosimetric comparison; Tumor control probability; Normal tissue complication probability; Target positioning error;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of target positioning error (TPE) on radiobiological parameters, such as tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for metastatic brain tumors of different sizes using CyberKnife. The reference SRS plans were created using the circular cone of the CyberKnife for each spherical gross tumor volume (GTV) with diameters (φ) of 5, 7.5, 10, 15, and 20 mm, contoured on computed tomography images of the head phantom. Subsequently, plans involving TPE were created by shifting the beam center by 0.1–2.0 mm in three dimensions relative to the reference plans using the same beam arrangements. Conformity index (CI), generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD)-based TCP, and NTCP of estimated brain necrosis were evaluated for each plan. When the gEUD parameter “a” was set to − 10, the CI and TCP for the reference plan at the φ5-mm GTV were 0.90 and 80.8%, respectively. The corresponding values for plans involving TPE of 0.5-mm, 1.0-mm, and 2.0-mm were 0.62 and 77.4%, 0.40 and 62.9%, and 0.12 and 7.2%, respectively. In contrast, the NTCP for all GTVs were the same. The TCP for the plans involving a TPE of 2-mm was 7.2% and 68.8% at the φ5-mm and φ20-mm GTV, respectively. The TPEs corresponding to a TCP reduction rate of 3% at the φ5-mm and φ20-mm GTV were 0.41 and 0.99 mm, respectively. TPE had a significant effect on TCP in SRS for metastatic brain tumors using CyberKnife, particularly for small GTVs.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 146
页数:11
相关论文
共 141 条
[1]  
Wiggenraad R(2011)Dose-effect relation in stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. A systematic review Radiother Oncol 98 292-297
[2]  
Verbeek-de Kanter A(2006)Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases: a randomized controlled trial JAMA 295 2483-2491
[3]  
Kal HB(2000)Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90-05 Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47 291-298
[4]  
Taphoorn M(2017)The dosimetric impact of the prescription isodose line (IDL) on the quality of robotic stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plans Med Phys 44 6159-6165
[5]  
Vissers T(2010)The CyberKnife Technol Cancer Res Treat 9 433-452
[6]  
Struikmans H(2014) robotic radiosurgery system in 2010 Med Dosim 39 1-6
[7]  
Aoyama H(2014)Experience with the CyberKnife for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery: analysis of dosimetry indices J Appl Clin Med Phys 15 4095-1479
[8]  
Shirato H(2019)Comparing gamma knife and cyberknife in patients with brain metastases J Neurosurg 132 1473-110
[9]  
Tago M(2019)Dosimetric comparison of fractionated radiosurgery plans using frameless Gamma Knife ICON and CyberKnife systems with linear accelerator-based radiosurgery plans for multiple large brain metastases J Appl Clin Med Phys 20 104-569
[10]  
Shaw E(2018)Dosimetric quality and delivery efficiency of robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases: comparison with C-arm linear accelerator based plans Strahlenther Onkol 194 560-34108