Adapting a social-ecological resilience framework for food systems

被引:1
作者
Hodbod J. [1 ]
Eakin H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Walton Sustainability Solutions Initiatives, Julie Ann Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University, PO BOX 875204, Tempe, 85287-5402, AZ
[2] School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, PO BOX 875502, Tempe, 85287-5502, AZ
关键词
California; Diversity; Food systems; Resilience; Social-ecological systems;
D O I
10.1007/s13412-015-0280-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of applying social-ecological resilience thinking to food systems is twofold: first, to define those factors that help achieve a state in which food security for all and at all scales is possible and second, to provide insights into how to maintain the system in this desirable regime. However, the resilience of food systems is distinct from the broader conceptualizations of resilience in social-ecological systems because of the fundamentally normative nature of food systems: humans need food to survive, and thus, system stability is typically a primary policy objective for food system management. However, society also needs food systems that can intensify sustainably, i.e., feed everybody equitably, provide livelihoods, and avoid environmental degradation while responding flexibly to shocks and uncertainty. Today’s failure in meeting food security objectives can be interpreted as the lack of current governance arrangements to consider the full and differential dimensions of food system functions—economic, ecological, and social—at appropriate scales: in other words, the multifunctionality of food. We focus on functional and response diversity as two key attributes of resilient, multifunctional food systems, respectively, the number of different functional groups and the diversity of types of responses to disturbances within a functional group. Achieving food security will require functional redundancy and enhanced response diversity, creating multiple avenues to fulfill all food system objectives. We use the 2013–2015 drought in California to unpack the potential differences between managing for a single function—economic profit—and multiple functions. Our analysis emphasizes how the evolution of the Californian food system has reduced functional and response diversity and created vulnerabilities. Managing for the resilience of food systems will require a shift in priorities from profit maximization to the management for all functions that create full food security at multiple scales. © 2015, AESS.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 484
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Adger W.N., Eakin H., Winkels A., Nested and teleconnected vulnerabilities to environmental change, Front Ecol Environ, 7, 3, pp. 150-157, (2009)
[2]  
Allison H.E., Hobbs R.J., Resilience, adaptive capacity, and the “Lock-in Trap” of the western Australian agricultural region, Ecol Soc, 9, 1, (2004)
[3]  
Altieri M.A., Agroecology: a new research and development paradigm for world agriculture, Agric Ecosyst Environ, 27, 1-4, pp. 37-46, (1989)
[4]  
Berkes F., Folke C., Linking social and ecological systems, (1998)
[5]  
Berkes F., Hughes T.P., Steneck R.S., Wilson J.A., Bellwood D.R., Crona B., Worm B., Ecology. Globalization, roving bandits, and marine resources, Science (New York, NY), 311, 5767, pp. 1557-1558, (2006)
[6]  
Carpenter S., Walker B., Anderies J.M., Abel N., From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what?, Ecosystems, 4, 8, pp. 765-781, (2001)
[7]  
Cash S., Zilberman D., Environmental issues in California agriculture, California agriculture dimensions and issues, (2003)
[8]  
California agricultural statistics review 2013-2014, (2014)
[9]  
Cinner J.E., McClanahan T.R., Daw T.M., Graham N.A.J., Maina J., Wilson S.K., Hughes T.P., Linking social and ecological systems to sustain coral reef fisheries, Curr Biol, 19, 3, pp. 206-212, (2009)
[10]  
Clapp J., Food, (2011)