Comparison of startup and anaerobic wastewater treatment in UASB, hybrid and baffled reactor

被引:0
|
作者
M. Hutňan
M. Drtil
L. Mrafková
J. Derco
J. Buday
机构
[1] Slovak University of Technology,
[2] Faculty of Chemical Technology,undefined
[3] Department of Environmental Science,undefined
[4] Radlinského 9,undefined
[5] 812 37 Bratislava,undefined
[6] Slovakia,undefined
来源
Bioprocess Engineering | 1999年 / 21卷
关键词
Wastewater Treatment; Synthetic Wastewater; Filamentous Bacterium; Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant; Digested Sludge;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An experimental study was carried out to compare the performance of selected anaerobic high rate reactors operated simultaneously at 37 °C. The three reactors, namely upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor (UASB), hybrid of UASB reactor and anaerobic filter (anaerobic hybrid reactor – AHR) and anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR), were inoculated with the anaerobic digested sludge from municipal wastewater treatment plant and tested with synthetic wastewater. This wastewater contained sodium acetate and glucose with balanced nutrients and trace elements (COD 6000 mg · l−1). Organic loading rate (Bv) was increased gradually from an initial 0.5 kg · m−3 · d−1 to 15 kg · m−3 · d−1 in all the reactors. From the comparison of the reactors' performance, the lowest biomass wash-out resulted from ABR. In the UASB, significant biomass wash-out was observed at the Bv 6 kg · m−3 · d−1, and in the AHR at the Bv 12 kg · m−3 · d−1. The demand of sodium bicarbonate for pH maintenance in ABR was two times higher as for UASB and AHR. The efficiency of COD removal was comparable for all three reactors – 80–90%. A faster biomass granulation was observed in the ABR than in the other two reactors. This fact is explained by the kinetic selection of filamentous bacteria of the Methanotrix sp. under a high (over 1.5 g · l−1) acetate concentration.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 445
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of startup and anaerobic wastewater treatment in UASB, hybrid and baffled reactor
    Hutnan, M
    Drtil, M
    Mrafková, L
    Derco, J
    Buday, J
    BIOPROCESS ENGINEERING, 1999, 21 (05) : 439 - 445
  • [2] Hybrid anaerobic baffled reactor for treatment of desizing wastewater
    Liu, R. R.
    Tian, Q.
    Yang, B.
    Chen, J. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 7 (01) : 111 - 118
  • [3] Hybrid anaerobic baffled reactor for treatment of desizing wastewater
    R. R. Liu
    Q. Tian
    B. Yang
    J. H. Chen
    International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 7 : 111 - 118
  • [4] Swine wastewater treatment using an anaerobic baffled (ARB) and a UASB reactor system
    Rodrigues, Luciano dos Santos
    Araujo Pinto, Ana Cristina
    Ferraz Dutra, Joyce da Cruz
    Sampaio, Renata Rodrigues
    de Sousa, Stella Rubim
    da Silva, Israel Jose
    SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2017, 38 (06): : 3705 - 3713
  • [5] Research on treatment of printing and dyeing wastewater by hybrid anaerobic baffled reactor
    Huang, Ruimin
    Liu, Zhen
    Zhou, Xiaoyun
    Mo, Jiancheng
    Liu, Xin
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2015, 54 (03) : 590 - 597
  • [6] Anaerobic baffled reactor for treatment of swine wastewater
    de Oliveira, Roberto Alves
    Duda, Rose Maria
    Rodrigues Fernandes, Gracie Ferraz
    ENGENHARIA SANITARIA E AMBIENTAL, 2014, 19 (04) : 383 - 391
  • [8] Anaerobic treatment of fibreboard manufacturing wastewater:: Comparison between an UASB reactor and an anaerobic filter
    Fernandez, Jose M.
    Carballa, Marta
    Omil, Francisco
    Lema, Juan M.
    AFINIDAD, 2007, 64 (531) : 589 - 595
  • [9] A comparison of the technological effectiveness of dairy wastewater treatment in anaerobic UASB reactor and anaerobic reactor with an innovative design
    Jedrzejewska-Cicinska, M.
    Kozak, K.
    Krzemieniewski, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 28 (10) : 1127 - 1133
  • [10] Treatment of Amman Slaughterhouse Wastewater by Anaerobic Baffled Reactor
    Bashar M. Al Smadi
    Wissam Al-Hayek
    Husam A. Abu Hajar
    International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019, 17 : 1445 - 1454