Field Evaluation of Bt Cotton Crop Impact on Nontarget Pests: Cotton Aphid and Boll Weevil

被引:0
作者
E R Sujii
P H B Togni
P de A Ribeiro
T de A Bernardes
P V G N Milane
D P Paula
C S S Pires
E M G Fontes
机构
[1] Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotcnologia-Cenargen,
[2] Univ Federal de Viçosa,undefined
[3] Univ de Brasilia,undefined
[4] Centro Universitário de Brasília-UNICEUB,undefined
来源
Neotropical Entomology | 2013年 / 42卷
关键词
Biosafety; cry toxin; herbivory; nontarget organism; sustainable pest management;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bt cotton plants expressing Cry1Ac protein have high specificity for the control of lepidopteran larvae. However, studies conducted in several countries have shown these plants have a differential impact on nontarget herbivores. The aim of this study was to compare the colonization rates and population abundance of the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis Boheman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in plots of Bt (Nuopal) and non-Bt cotton (Delta Opal) in an experimental field in Brasilia, DF, Brazil. No difference was observed in the preference and colonization by winged aphids to plants from the two treatments. There was no significant difference in abundance of wingless aphids or in the production of winged aphids between treatments. Apparently, the parameters that control factors such as fecundity, survival, and dispersal were similar on both Bt and non-Bt plants. Monitoring of plants for coccinellids, a specialist predator of aphids, and ants that act on the dispersal of aphids among plants showed no significant difference between Bt and non-Bt plants, supporting the inference above. Regarding the effect on boll weevil, there was also no significant difference between treatments in the total number of fruiting structures attacked in each plot, the percentage of fruiting structures attacked per plant or on the number of weevils emerging from fruits with boll weevil damage from egg-laying, when damaged fruit samples were held in the laboratory. Based on these results, we conclude that there is no impact of Bt cotton crop expressing Cry1Ac on the nontarget herbivores tested under field conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 111
页数:9
相关论文
共 131 条
  • [21] de Carvalho F(1998)Impact of transgenic cotton plants on non-target pest, Crop Sci 38 1-437
  • [22] Gheysen G(2000) Glover Curr Sci 79 421-929
  • [23] Kushnir S(2004)Mirid bug outbreaks in multiple crops correlated with wide-scale adoption of Bt cotton in China Environ Entomol 33 921-1256
  • [24] Van Montagu M(2008)Season-long variation in expression of Pesq Agropec Bras 43 1251-72
  • [25] Inze D(2005) gene and efficacy of Int J Trop Insect Sci 25 63-1241
  • [26] Castresana C(2005) toxin in transgenic cotton against Environ Entomol 35 1224-436
  • [27] Deng SD(2010) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Transgenic Res 19 425-318
  • [28] Xu J(2003)Field trial analysis of nitrate reductase co-suppression: a comparative study of 38 combinations of transgene Pop Ecol 32 312-52
  • [29] Zhang QW(2005)Development and commercial use of Bollgard cotton in the USA—nearly promises versus today´s reality Ann Rev Entomol 50 31-undefined
  • [30] Zhou SW(undefined)Host plant selection by aphids: behavioral, evolutionary, and applied perspectives undefined undefined undefined-undefined