Weightings on the Propagation of Errors in the Vickers Hardness Parameters

被引:0
作者
Thiago de Lima Gontarski
Aline Peres Leal
Rafael Machado Casali
Sandro Elias Braun
Paulo Soares
André Luís Condino Fujarra
Alexandre Mikowski
机构
[1] Federal University of Santa Catarina,Department of Mobility Engineering
[2] Technological Center of Joinville,Department of Mechanical Engineering
[3] Graduate Program in Mechanical Engineering and Sciences,undefined
[4] Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo,undefined
[5] Graduate Program in Naval and Ocean Engineering,undefined
[6] State Secretary for Education of Rio Grande do Sul,undefined
[7] Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná,undefined
[8] Polytechnic School,undefined
来源
Brazilian Journal of Physics | 2022年 / 52卷
关键词
Vickers hardness; Propagation of errors; LPE; Monte Carlo simulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is known that the value of an experimental quantity is considered to be adequately determined when there is an indication of its respective error (or uncertainty); otherwise, it is not possible to know at which level of precision it is being working. The most common method to evaluate the measurement uncertainty is the Guide to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), based on the Law of Propagation of Uncertainty (LPU), which in physics sciences is known as Law of Propagation of Errors (LPE). This work presents a theoretical evaluation of the parameters that influence the Vickers hardness (HV) error obtained by the error propagation method. Vickers indentations were performed on soda–lime–silica glasses to compare the results of descriptive statistics with the error by propagating errors. In addition, Monte Carlo Simulations (MCS) were performed and validated by the experimental data. It can be said that the error model proved to be more accurate than the conventional approach; in other words, the descriptive statistic overestimates the uncertainty value of the Vickers hardness. Comparing the model results for the error propagation in HV with the MCS, it can be said that the MCS method was validated by the experimental results and, therefore, it is recommended to use the error propagation to evaluate the uncertainty of Vickers hardness.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Smith RL(1922)An accurate method of determining the hardness of metals, with particular reference to those of a high degree of hardness Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. B J. Eng. 102 623-641
[2]  
Sandland GE(2010)On hydrogen-induced vickers indentation cracking in high-strength steel Mech. Res. Commun. 37 230-234
[3]  
Yonezu A(2018)Electric induced curing of graphene/cement-based composites for structural strength formation in deep-freeze low temperature Mater. Des. 160 783-793
[4]  
Arino M(2014)A study of a micro-indentation technique for estimating the fracture toughness of al6061-t6 Mech. Res. Commun. 58 10-16
[5]  
Kondo T(2006)Optimised measurement uncertainty and decision-making when sampling by variables or by attribute Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation 39 829-840
[6]  
Hirakata H(2010)Nanoindentation: Measuring methods and applications CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 59 803-819
[7]  
Minoshima K(2015)Measurement of elastic modulus by instrumented indentation in the macro-range: Uncertainty evaluation Int. J. Mech. Sci. 101–102 161-169
[8]  
Liu Y(2003)Uncertainty evaluation of shore hardness testers Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation 33 251-257
[9]  
Wang M(2017)Monte Carlo method for evaluation of uncertainty of measurement in Brinell hardness scale Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 55 445-453
[10]  
Wang W(2017)Comparison of GUM and Monte Carlo methods for the uncertainty estimation in hardness measurements Int.J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 8 1-9