Integrated analysis of next generation sequencing minimal residual disease (MRD) and PET scan in transplant eligible myeloma patients

被引:0
作者
Rodrigo Fonseca
Mariano Arribas
Julia E. Wiedmeier-Nutor
Yael N. Kusne
Miguel González Vélez
Heidi E. Kosiorek
Richard (Duke) J. Butterfield
Ilan R. Kirsch
Joseph R. Mikhael
A. Keith Stewart
Craig Reeder
Jeremy Larsen
P. Leif Bergsagel
Rafael Fonseca
机构
[1] Mayo Clinic,Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology
[2] Dignity Health Cancer Institute,Department of Health Sciences Research
[3] Mayo Clinic,Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
[4] Translational Medicine,undefined
[5] Adaptive Biotechnologies,undefined
[6] Translational Genomics Research Institute,undefined
[7] City of Hope Cancer Center,undefined
[8] University Health Network,undefined
来源
Blood Cancer Journal | / 13卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Minimal residual disease (MRD) assays allow response assessment in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and negativity is associated with improved survival outcomes. The role of highly sensitive next generation sequencing (NGS) MRD in combination with functional imaging remains to be validated. We performed a retrospective analysis on MM patients who underwent frontline autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Patients were evaluated at day 100 post-ASCT with NGS-MRD and positron emission tomography (PET-CT). Patients with ≥ 2 MRD measurements were included in a secondary analysis for sequential measurements. 186 patients were included. At day 100, 45 (24.2%) patients achieved MRD negativity at a sensitivity threshold of 10−6. MRD negativity was the most predictive factor for longer time to next treatment (TTNT). Negativity rates did not differ according to MM subtype, R-ISS Stage nor cytogenetic risk. PET-CT and MRD had poor agreement, with high rates of PET-CT negativity in MRD-positive patients. Patients with sustained MRD negativity had longer TTNT, regardless of baseline risk characteristics. Our results show that the ability to measure deeper and sustainable responses distinguishes patients with better outcomes. Achieving MRD negativity was the strongest prognostic marker and could help guide therapy-related decisions and serve as a response marker for clinical trials.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 235 条
[1]  
Bladé J(1998)Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Myeloma Subcommittee of the EBMT. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant Br J Haematol 102 1115-23
[2]  
Samson D(2006)International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma Leukemia 20 1467-73
[3]  
Reece D(2016)International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma Lancet Oncol 17 e328-e46
[4]  
Apperley J(2016)NCCN Guidelines Insights: Multiple Myeloma, Version 3.2016 J Natl Compr Canc Netw 14 389-400
[5]  
Björkstrand B(2012)A phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone as a frontline treatment for multiple myeloma Blood 120 1801-9
[6]  
Gahrton G(2012)Lenalidomide maintenance after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma N Engl J Med 366 1782-91
[7]  
Durie BG(2017)Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial Lancet 389 519-27
[8]  
Harousseau JL(2017)Lenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis J Clin Oncol 35 3279-89
[9]  
Miguel JS(2012)Clonal competition with alternating dominance in multiple myeloma Blood 120 1067-76
[10]  
Bladé J(2015)Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: Bringing the bench to the bedside Nat Rev Clin Oncol 12 286-95