The Ancillary Benefits from Climate Policy in the United States

被引:1
作者
Britt Groosman
Nicholas Z. Muller
Erin O’Neill-Toy
机构
[1] Environmental Defense Fund,Economics Department
[2] Middlebury College,undefined
来源
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2011年 / 50卷
关键词
Climate change; Co-benefits; Local air pollution; Human health; Value of a statistical life;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study investigates the benefits to human health that would occur in the United States (US) due to reductions in local air pollutant emissions stemming from a federal policy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In order to measure the impacts of reduced emissions of local pollutants, this study considers the Warner-Lieberman bill (S.2191) of 2007 and the paper considers the impacts of reduced emissions in the transport and electric power sectors. This analysis provides strong evidence that climate change policy in the US will generate significant returns to society in excess of the benefits due to climate stabilization. The total health-related co-benefits associated with a representative climate policy over the years 2010–2030 range between $103 billion and $1.2 trillion in present value terms. Much of the co-benefit stems from between 32,000 and 189,000 avoided premature mortalities associated with exposure to PM2.5 and O3. Most of the co-benefits are due to reduced emissions of SO2 from coal-fired power plants since these are an important contribution to ambient concentrations of PM2.5. Among the most important determinants of co-benefits is the relationship between climate policy and existing policies governing SO2 discharges from coal-fired power generation capacity. If SO2 emissions are permitted to remain at current levels, total co-benefits are cut by 65%. We find that the co-benefit per ton of CO2 emissions ranges between $1 and $77 depending on modeling assumptions and year.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 603
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Co-benefits of climate policy - lessons learned from a study in Shanxi, China
    Aunan, K
    Fang, JH
    Vennemo, H
    Oye, K
    Seip, HM
    ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (04) : 567 - 581
  • [42] Camping climate resources: the camping climate index in the United States
    Ma, Siyao
    Craig, Christopher A.
    Feng, Song
    CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2021, 24 (18) : 2523 - 2531
  • [43] Shelter from the storm: The growing threats from climate change to housing in the United States
    Fischer, Mary J.
    SOCIOLOGY COMPASS, 2024, 18 (07):
  • [44] Children's health impacts from a proposed decarbonization policy in the transportation sector in the Eastern United States
    Berberian, Alique G.
    Perera, Frederica
    Arunachalam, Saravanan
    Levy, Jonathan, I
    Buckley, Laura
    Arter, Calvin
    Coomes, Kaitlyn E.
    Buonocore, Jonathan J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 19 (04)
  • [45] Quantifying air quality co-benefits of climate policy across sectors and regions
    Vandyck, Toon
    Keramidas, Kimon
    Tchung-Ming, Stephane
    Weitzel, Matthias
    Van Dingenen, Rita
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (03) : 1501 - 1517
  • [46] Quantifying air quality co-benefits of climate policy across sectors and regions
    Toon Vandyck
    Kimon Keramidas
    Stéphane Tchung-Ming
    Matthias Weitzel
    Rita Van Dingenen
    Climatic Change, 2020, 163 : 1501 - 1517
  • [47] HOW CLIMATE CHANGE IS CHOKING THE UNITED STATES
    Gewin, Virginia
    NATURE, 2022, 612 (7939) : 204 - 207
  • [48] China, the United States, bargaining, and climate change
    Shum, Robert Y.
    INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2014, 14 (01) : 83 - 100
  • [49] The social sciences in climate assessments in the United States
    Keely B. Maxwell
    Maureen Shacklette
    Emily Eisenhauer
    Austin A. Scheetz
    Elizabeth Marino
    Ariela Zycherman
    Climatic Change, 2025, 178 (5)
  • [50] The Ideology of Climate Change Denial in the United States
    Collomb, Jean-Daniel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AMERICAN STUDIES, 2014, 9 (01):