Periimplant bone regeneration in hydroxyapatite block grafts with mesenchymal stem cells and bone morphogenetic protein-2

被引:0
作者
Jee-Hyun Park
Young-Eun Jung
Myung-Jin Kim
Soon Jung Hwang
机构
[1] Seoul National University,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, School of Dentistry
[2] Seoul National University,Dental Research Institute, BK 21 Plus
[3] Seoul National University,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry
来源
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine | 2016年 / 13卷
关键词
Dental Implant; Hydroxyapatite; Bone morphogenetic protein-2; Mesenchymal stromal cells; Osteogenesis; Osseointegration;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Hydroxyapatite (HA) blocks as an alternative material for autogenous onlay bone grafts are regarded as an insufficient substitute for osseointegration of dental implant. In this study, we evaluated the effects of dog mesenchymal stromal cells (dMSCs) with or without bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP) on new peri-implant bone formation after HA block graft. In four mandibular bone defects (8×8×6 mm each) in five beagle dogs, dental implants were placed with HA block loaded with autogenous dMSCs with or without BMP-2. Animals were sacrificed at eight weeks, and bone healing was evaluated among four groups consisting of 1) HA alone as a control, 2) HA+dMSCs, 3) HA+BMP-2, and 4) HA+dMSCs+BMP-2. According to histomorphometric evaluation, the MSC+BMP-2 group and the BMP-2 group showed significantly higher bone-implant-contact (BIC) length than the MSC group, while there was no significant difference in new bone formation among the groups. According to micro-CT analysis, bone volume and bone mineral density were significantly higher in the MSC+BMP-2 group compared with the control group (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively). BIC was significantly higher in the MSC+BMP-2 group than both the control and MSC groups (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively). In conclusion, our results showed that bone regeneration at peri-implant bone defects grafted with HA blocks was significantly increased by dual delivery of MSCs and BMP-2. Conversely, HA blocks with MSC or BMP-2 alone did not allow for efficient peri-implant bone regeneration.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 445
页数:8
相关论文
共 157 条
  • [1] Brånemark PI(1983)Osseointegration and its experimental background J Prosthet Dent 50 399-410
  • [2] Buser D(1999)Localized ridge augmentation with autografts and barrier membranes Periodontol 2000 19 151-163
  • [3] Dula K(1984)Donor-site morbidity after harvesting rib and iliac bone Plast Reconstr Surg 73 933-938
  • [4] Hess D(1995)The potential for HIV transmission through allogeneic bone A review of risks and safety. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80 17-23
  • [5] Hirt HP(1987)The immune response to osteochondral allografts in dogs J Bone Joint Surg Am 69 573-582
  • [6] Belser UC(2001)Tissue engineering: current state and prospects Annu Rev Med 52 443-451
  • [7] Laurie SW(1997)Treatment of acute fractures with a collagen-calcium phosphate graft material A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79 495-502
  • [8] Kaban LB(1996)Geometry of porous hydroxyapatite implants influences osteogenesis in baboons (Papio ursinus) J Craniofac Surg 7 71-78
  • [9] Mulliken JB(1998)Growth factor stimulation of bone healing Effects on osteoblasts, osteomies, and implants fixation. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 283 2-37
  • [10] Murray JE(1975)Tissue ingrowth of Replamineform implants J Biomed Mater Res 9 29-45