Seismicity and seismic hazard parameters in and around Pakistan

被引:0
作者
Khaista Rehman
Paul W. Burton
机构
[1] University of Peshawar,National Centre of Excellence in Geology
[2] University of East Anglia,School of Environmental Sciences
来源
Journal of Seismology | 2020年 / 24卷
关键词
Gumbel III distribution; Earthquake; Upper bound magnitude; Expected magnitude; Pakistan;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pakistan holds a key position within the Indian–Eurasian collision zone and is a highly earthquake-prone country of South Asia. Besides the devastating earthquakes of Quetta 1935, Makran 1945 and Pattan 1974, the earthquakes that happened in Bhuj 2001, Kashmir 2005 and Hindu Kush 2015 are three typical examples of the new millennium. In this study, the earthquake probability and the return period for magnitude recurrence hazard have been analysed using a magnitude homogenous earthquake catalogue. In Gumbel’s theory of extreme values, the Gumbel III distribution has a vital role to play as far as seismic hazard analysis of any regional seismicity is concerned. The Gumbel III distribution is used here to estimate the upper bound magnitude (ω value) and other earthquake hazard parameters in and around Pakistan. This method is applied to the whole of Pakistan (23° N–39° N; 59° E–80° E) and shallow (0–70 km) and intermediate (70–300 km) depth earthquakes in the Hindu Kush region across the Afghanistan–Pakistan border over the period 1930–2007. From the entire Pakistan dataset, the ω value is estimated as 8.12 (± 0.59). Furthermore, intermediate earthquakes in Hindu Kush have a ω value of 8.15 (± 0.56) compared with 7.08 (± 0.92) for the shallow earthquakes in the Hindu Kush. From probabilistic analysis of a spatial matrix of cells, results of earthquake expected magnitude parameters are then calculated, mapped, contoured and discussed in the context of recognized seismotectonic zones (Hindu Kush, Karakorum–Himalaya, Chaman fault system and Makran–Kutch) which characterize the seismicity of Pakistan and the surrounding region (Afghanistan, Tajikistan and India).
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 653
页数:18
相关论文
共 195 条
[1]  
Al-Abbasi JN(1991)GEMPAK: a FORTRAN-77 program for calculating Gumbel’s first, third, and mixture upper earthquake magnitude distributions employing maximum likelihood estimation Comput Geosci 17 271-290
[2]  
Fahmi KJ(2003)Earthquakes and associated deformation in Northern Baluchistan 1892–2001 Bull Seismol Soc Am 93 1573-1605
[3]  
Ambraseys N(2003)Earthquakes in Afghanistan Seismol Res Lett 74 107-123
[4]  
Bilham R(2008)Regional variation of the ω - upper bound magnitude of GIII distribution in and around Turkey: tectonic implications for earthquake hazards Pure Appl Geophys 165 1367-1390
[5]  
Ambraseys N(2001)The January 26, 2001 Republic Day earthquake India Seismol Res Lett 72 328-335
[6]  
Bilham R(2004)Earthquakes in India and the Himalaya: tectonics, geodesy and history Ann Geophys 47 839-858
[7]  
Bayrak Y(2006)Dangerous tectonics, fragile buildings, and tough decisions Science 311 1873-1875
[8]  
Ozturk S(2007)Seismic hazard in Karachi, Pakistan: uncertain past, uncertain future Seismol Res Lett 78 601-613
[9]  
Cinar H(1977)Spatial distribution and focal mechanisms of mantle earthquakes in the Hindu Kush-Pamir region: a contorted Benioff zone Geology 5 699-704
[10]  
Koravos GC(2004)Source parameters and tectonic implications of aftershocks of the Mw 7.6 Bhuj earthquake of 26 January 2001 Seismol Soc Am 94 817-827