Toward an integrative organizational framework for outsourced R&D efficiency

被引：0
作者：
Pereme F. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Rose B. [2 ,4 ]
Goepp V. [3 ,4 ]
Radoux J.P. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Altran Technologies Boulevard Sébastien Brand, Illkirch-Graffenstaden
[2] Université de Strasbourg, 3-5 rue de l’université, Strasbourg
[3] INSA Strasbourg, 16 Boulevard de la victoire, Strasbourg
[4] ICube UMR CNRS 7357, 16 Boulevard de la victoire, Strasbourg
来源：
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) | 2018年 / 12卷 / 4期
关键词：
Industrial R&D; Innovation; Metrics; R&D;
D O I：
10.1007/s12008-017-0454-4
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Integrating Research with Development (R&D) by industrial firms in the early twentieth century was the first step of industrial R&D. Industrial R&D, is nowadays considered as a high resource consumer, in time, money and human work, with a high risk of non-return on investment. Nevertheless R&D divisions are the only way for companies to innovate and keep competitive. So, measuring productivity and added value of R&D division has become a major issue. We are interested in how the R&D articulation allows to convert scientific issues in product prototypes and finally in product innovation. A specific point of interest lays in how an effective measurement framework could improve R&D productivity. © 2018, Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码：1515 / 1525
页数：10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Arnold J., Practice led research: creative activity, academic debate, and intellectual rigour, High. Educ. Stud., 2, 2, (2012)
  • [2] Baldwin C., von Hippel E., Modeling a paradigm shift: from producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation, Organ. Sci., 22, 6, pp. 1399-1417, (2011)
  • [3] Andres B.-G., Alberto L., R versus D: Estimating the Differentiated Effect of Research and Development on Innovation Results, (2011)
  • [4] Bryant A., Charmaz K., The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory, (2010)
  • [5] Christensen C., The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, (2013)
  • [6] Corbin J., Strauss A., Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, (2014)
  • [7] Cropley D.H., Kaufman J.C., Measuring functional creativity: non-expert raters and the creative solution diagnosis scale, J. Creat. Behav., 46, 2, pp. 119-137, (2012)
  • [8] Cropley D.H., Kaufman J.C., Cropley A.J., Measuring creativity for innovation management, J. Technol. Manag. Innov., 6, 3, pp. 13-30, (2011)
  • [9] Engward H., Understanding grounded theory, Nurs. Stand., 28, 7, pp. 37-41, (2013)
  • [10] Enkel E., Gassmann O., Chesbrough H., Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon, R&D Manag., 39, 4, pp. 311-316, (2009)
1234