Giving the Gift of Goodness: An Exploration of Socially Responsible Gift-Giving

被引:0
作者
Todd Green
Julie Tinson
John Peloza
机构
[1] Brock University,Goodman School of Business
[2] University of Stirling,Stirling Management School
[3] Florida State University,undefined
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2016年 / 134卷
关键词
Consumer behavior; Corporate social responsibility; Gift-giving; Interviews; Qualitative;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Previous research demonstrates that consumers support firms’ CSR activities, and increasingly demand socially responsible products and services. However, an implicit assumption in the extant literature is that the purchaser and the consumer of the product are the same person. The current research focuses on a unique form of socially responsible consumption behavior: gift-giving. Through 30 depth consumer interviews, we develop a typology of consumers based on whether consumers integrate CSR-related information into purchases, and whether the purchases are for themselves or for others (i.e., gifts). We find that in some instances, consumers actively avoid purchasing products from socially responsible organizations and do so with the intention of managing their impressions with the gift recipient. This is counter to previous research that suggests consumers often choose to make socially responsible consumption decisions in efforts to satisfy self-presentation concerns. In addition, the decision to engage in socially responsible consumption for oneself but not for others was motivated by a variety of factors including the role of the recipient and a concern over the credibility of socially responsible gifts. Finally, some participants who do not incorporate CSR into their own personal consumption chose gifts based on a variety of CSR activities in an effort to build awareness for socially responsible organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 44
页数:15
相关论文
共 130 条
[1]  
Arnold SJ(1996)Organizational legitimacy and retail store patronage Journal of Business Research 35 229-239
[2]  
Handelman JM(2008)Do social product features have value to consumers? International Journal of Research in Marketing 25 183-191
[3]  
Tigert DJ(2007)Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility Academy of Management Review 32 794-816
[4]  
Auger P(2007)Consumer responses to retailer use of cause-related marketing: Is more fit better? Journal of Retailing 83 437-445
[5]  
Devinney TM(2006)Values motivation and concern for appearances: The effect of personality traits on responses to corporate social responsibility International Journal of Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Marketing 11 61-72
[6]  
Louviere JJ(1982)Effects of gift-giving involvement on gift selection strategies Advances in Consumer Research 9 408-412
[7]  
Burke PF(1984)Cultural and historical differences in concepts of self and their effects on attitudes toward having and giving Advances in Consumer Research 11 754-763
[8]  
Barnett ML(2004)Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives California Management Review 47 9-24
[9]  
Barone MJ(2010)Reputation building: Beyond our control? Inferences in consumers’ ethical perception formation Journal of Consumer Behaviour 9 275-292
[10]  
Norman AT(2001)The myth of the ethical consumer: Do ethics matters in purchase behavior? Journal of Consumer Marketing 18 560-577