Quantitative analysis of the impact factors of conventional energy carbon emissions in Kazakhstan based on LMDI decomposition and STIRPAT model

被引:0
作者
Jiaxiu Li
Yaning Chen
Zhi Li
Zhihui Liu
机构
[1] Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography,State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology
[2] CAS,College of Resource and Environment Science
[3] Xinjiang University,College of Resources and Environment
[4] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,undefined
来源
Journal of Geographical Sciences | 2018年 / 28卷
关键词
quantitative analysis; energy-related CO; emissions; STIRPAT model; Kazakhstan;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Quantitative analysis of the impact factors in energy-related CO2 emissions serves as an important guide for reducing carbon emissions and building an environmentally-friendly society. This paper aims to use LMDI method and a modified STIRPAT model to research the conventional energy-related CO2 emissions in Kazakhstan after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The results show that the trajectory of CO2 emissions displayed U-shaped curve from 1992 to 2013. Based on the extended Kaya identity and additive LMDI method, we decomposed total CO2 emissions into four influencing factors. Of those, the economic active effect is the most influential factor driving CO2 emissions, which produced 110.86 Mt CO2 emissions, with a contribution rate of 43.92%. The second driving factor is the population effect, which led to 11.87 Mt CO2 emissions with a contribution rate of 4.7%. On the contrary, the energy intensity effect is the most inhibiting factor, which caused–110.90 Mt CO2 emissions with a contribution rate of–43.94%, followed by the energy carbon structure effect resulting in–18.76 Mt CO2 emissions with a contribution rate of–7.43%. In order to provide an in-depth examination of the change response between energy-related CO2 emissions and each impact factor, we construct a modified STIRPAT model based on ridge regression estimation. The results indicate that for every 1% increase in population size, economic activity, energy intensity and energy carbon structure, there is a subsequent increase in CO2 emissions of 3.13%, 0.41%, 0.30% and 0.63%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1019
页数:18
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]  
Aggarwal P(2016)Energy demand and CO Journal of Cleaner Production 128 48-61
[2]  
Jain S(2004) emissions from urban on-road transport in Delhi: Current and future projections under various policy measures Energy Policy 32 1131-1139
[3]  
Ang B W(2005)Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: Which is the preferred method Energy Policy 33 867-871
[4]  
Ang B W(2015)The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: A practical guide Energy Policy 86 233-238
[5]  
Ang B W(2009)LMDI decomposition approach:^A guide for implementation Journal of US-China Public Administration 6 31-39
[6]  
Ardak Y(2016)Kazakhstan’s energy policy: Its evolution and tendencies Climatic Change 134 387-401
[7]  
Arnell N W(2016)The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale Investment Management and Financial Innovations 13 129-135
[8]  
Gosling S N(2010)Assessment of foreign direct investment, export and economic growth on the example of Kazakhstan OPEC Energy Review 29 115-131
[9]  
Azatbek T(1995)Energy partnership: China and the Gulf States Central Asian Survey 14 64-378
[10]  
Ramazanov A(2012)Energy, economics and security in Central Asia: Russia and its rivals Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 22 363-58