The Construction of Gender Among Working-Class Cohabiting Couples

被引:0
作者
Amanda Jayne Miller
Sharon Sassler
机构
[1] University of Indianapolis,Department of Social Sciences
[2] Cornell University,Department of Policy Analysis & Management
来源
Qualitative Sociology | 2012年 / 35卷
关键词
Cohabitation; Gender roles; Housework; Paid work; Working class;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Utilizing three typologies that emerged from the data, we examine how 30 working-class cohabiting couples construct gender through paid and domestic labor. Contesting couples contain at least one partner, usually the woman, who attempts to construct more egalitarian arrangements. In Conventional and Counter-Conventional couples, neither partner is actively contesting their gendered arrangements. Among Conventional couples each partner adheres to a traditional division of labor. Normative gender arrangements are upended in Contesting and Counter-Conventional couples when the female partner resists financial dependence on her male partner or if or the male partner does not earn enough income to provide even for himself. Nevertheless, institutionalized gender roles appear deeply entrenched among the working-class cohabitors in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 446
页数:19
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Aronson P(2003)Feminists or ‘postfeminists’?: Young women’s attitudes toward feminism and gender relations Gender and Society 17 903-922
  • [2] Bianchi SM(2000)Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor Social Forces 79 191-228
  • [3] Milkie MA(2004)Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Change in women and men, 1974–1998 Social Forces 83 759-790
  • [4] Sayer LC(2008)‘But will it last?’ Marital instability among interracial and same-race couples Family Relations 57 160-171
  • [5] Robinson JP(1994)Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home The American Journal of Sociology 100 652-688
  • [6] Bolzendahl C(1999)The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage American Sociological Review 64 333-356
  • [7] Myers D(1998)The extended case method Sociological Theory 16 4-33
  • [8] Bratter J(2004)The deinstitutionalization of American marriage Journal of Marriage and Family 66 848-862
  • [9] King R(2004)Cohabitation and housework: The effects on marital intentions Journal of Marriage and Family 66 118-125
  • [10] Brines J(1995)Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions Social Forces 74 609-632