Investigating the collection and assessment of patient-reported outcome data amongst unplanned surgical hospital admissions: A feasibility study

被引:0
|
作者
Mason J.D. [1 ]
Blencowe N.S. [1 ,4 ]
McNair A.G.K. [1 ]
Stevens D.J. [2 ]
Avery K.N. [1 ]
Pullyblank A.M. [3 ]
Blazeby J.M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Centre for Surgical Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol
[2] University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford, Headington
[3] North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Department of Surgery, Southmead Way, Bristol
[4] University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Division of Surgery, Head and Neck, Marlborough Street, Bristol
基金
英国科研创新办公室; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Emergency surgery; Feasibility; Methodology; Patient reported outcomes; Trial design;
D O I
10.1186/s40814-015-0011-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in surgery can be challenging to conduct, and trials in the emergency surgical setting when patients have unplanned hospital admissions are particularly difficult. One area of challenge is capturing baseline patient-reported outcome (PRO) data. This study examined the feasibility and optimal methods for the collection of baseline and follow-up PRO data in the setting of unplanned surgical hospital admissions. Methods: Clinically stable adult patients with unplanned admissions through the day and night under the care of general surgeons at two acute NHS trusts were approached during working week days and asked to complete validated PRO measures (European Quality of Life-5 Dimension, Short Form-12, and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index) on admission and 6 weeks following discharge. Feasibility of PRO data collection was determined by the proportions of admitted patients eligible and recruited and by questionnaire-response rates at baseline and follow up. Reasons for non-recruitment and non-completion of questionnaires were sought and recorded. Results: There were 276 admissions, of whom 235 (85.1 %) were eligible. Reasons for ineligibility were the following: age under 18 years old (n=5, 1.8 %), non-surgical presenting complaint (n=6, 2.2 %) and clinical instability (n=30, 10.9 %). One hundred and sixty-six patients (70.6 %) were recruited (98 female, 59.0 %); median age 53, range 19-100). Common reasons for non-recruitment included patients being discharged home before approached by researchers (n=29, 12.3 %) or declining participation because they felt unwell (n=15, 6.4 %). The most common reason for admission to the hospital was abdominal pain (n=120, 72.3 % recruited patients), of whom 50 (30.1 %) required operative intervention. Baseline PRO data was obtained from 153 patients (93.3 %), and 74 (48.4 %) returned follow-up questionnaires. Conclusions: Collection of baseline PRO data amongst unplanned admissions in general surgery is feasible. Methods for optimising retention and follow up are needed. © 2015 Mason et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and Feasibility Testing of PROMPT-Care, an eHealth System for Collection and Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care: A Study Protocol
    Girgis, Afaf
    Delaney, Geoff P.
    Arnold, Anthony
    Miller, Alexis Andrew
    Levesque, Janelle V.
    Kaadan, Nasreen
    Carolan, Martin G.
    Cook, Nicole
    Masters, Kenneth
    Tran, Thomas T.
    Sandell, Tiffany
    Durcinoska, Ivana
    Gerges, Martha
    Avery, Sandra
    Ng, Weng
    Della-Fiorentina, Stephen
    Dhillon, Haryana M.
    Maher, Ashley
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2016, 5 (04):
  • [22] Optimizing Electronic Capture of Clinical Outcome Assessment Data in Clinical Trials: The Case of Patient-Reported Endpoints
    Fleming, Sarah
    Barsdorf, Alexandra I.
    Howry, Cindy
    O'Gorman, Hannah
    Coons, Stephen Joel
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2015, 49 (06) : 797 - 804
  • [23] Optimizing Electronic Capture of Clinical Outcome Assessment Data in Clinical Trials: The Case of Patient-Reported Endpoints
    Sarah Fleming
    Alexandra I. Barsdorf
    Cindy Howry
    Hannah O’Gorman
    Stephen Joel Coons
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2015, 49 : 797 - 804
  • [24] The design, implementation, and impact of an automated patient-reported outcome data collection and adverse event surveillance tool: a randomized trial
    Zhou, Megan S.
    Jain, Tanya
    Hardy, Nick
    Perez-Segura, Alejandro
    Hickman, Jasmine
    Leopold, Laurey
    Qualliotine, Kerry
    Yedidi, Raagini S.
    Whetsell, Matthew
    Broffman, Lauren
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [25] A feasibility assessment of functioning and quality-of-life patient-reported outcome measures in adult epilepsy clinics: A systematic review
    Jones, Felipe J. S.
    Ezzeddine, Farrah L.
    Herman, Susan T.
    Buchhalter, Jeffrey
    Fureman, Brandy
    Moura, Lidia M. V. R.
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2020, 102
  • [26] Minimally invasive versus open lumbar spinal fusion: a matched study investigating patient-reported and surgical outcomes
    Mooney, James
    Michalopoulos, Giorgos D.
    Alvi, Mohammed Ali
    Zeitouni, Daniel
    Chan, Andrew K.
    Mummaneni, Praveen, V
    Bisson, Erica F.
    Sherrod, Brandon A.
    Haid, Regis W.
    Knightly, John J.
    Devin, Clinton J.
    Pennicooke, Brenton
    Asher, Anthony L.
    Bydon, Mohamad
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2022, 36 (05) : 753 - 766
  • [27] The design, implementation, and impact of an automated patient-reported outcome data collection and adverse event surveillance tool: a randomized trial
    Megan S. Zhou
    Tanya Jain
    Nick Hardy
    Alejandro Perez-Segura
    Jasmine Hickman
    Laurey Leopold
    Kerry Qualliotine
    Raagini S. Yedidi
    Matthew Whetsell
    Lauren Broffman
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [28] Measuring Frailty Using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Data: A Feasibility Study in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
    Murugappan, Meena N. N.
    King-Kallimanis, Bellinda L. L.
    Bhatnagar, Vishal
    Kanapuru, Bindu
    Farley, Joel F. F.
    Seifert, Randall D. D.
    Stenehjem, David D. D.
    Chen, Ting-Yu
    Horodniceanu, Erica G. G.
    Kluetz, Paul G. G.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (08) : 2281 - 2292
  • [29] Measuring Frailty Using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Data: A Feasibility Study in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
    Meena N. Murugappan
    Bellinda L. King-Kallimanis
    Vishal Bhatnagar
    Bindu Kanapuru
    Joel F. Farley
    Randall D. Seifert
    David D. Stenehjem
    Ting-Yu Chen
    Erica G. Horodniceanu
    Paul G. Kluetz
    Quality of Life Research, 2023, 32 : 2281 - 2292
  • [30] “Bring Your Own Device” (BYOD): The Future of Field-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection in Clinical Trials?
    Chad Gwaltney
    Stephen Joel Coons
    Paul O’Donohoe
    Hannah O’Gorman
    Matthew Denomey
    Cindy Howry
    Jennifer Ross
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2015, 49 : 783 - 791