"CADEAT": considerations on the use of CAD (computer-aided diagnosis) in mammography

被引:2
作者
Chersevani, R. [2 ]
Ciatto, S. [1 ]
Del Favero, C. [3 ]
Frigerio, A. [4 ]
Giordano, L. [5 ]
Giuseppetti, G. [6 ]
Naldoni, C. [7 ]
Panizza, P. [8 ]
Petrella, M. [9 ]
Saguatti, G. [10 ]
机构
[1] Ist Sci Prevenz Oncol, ISPO, I-50131 Florence, Italy
[2] Soc Italiana Radiol Med, Sez Studio Senol, Milan, Italy
[3] Fdn Don Carlo Gnocchi IRCS, Milan, Italy
[4] AOU S Giovanni Battista, Ctr Riferimento Reg Screening Mammograf, Turin, Italy
[5] AOU S Giovanni Battista, CPO Piemonte, Unita Epidemiol, Turin, Italy
[6] Univ Politecn Marche, Fac Med, Ancona, Italy
[7] Ctr Riferimento & Coordinamento Screening Oncol, Bologna, Italy
[8] Univ Milan, Osped San Raffaele, Dipartimento Radiol, I-20127 Milan, Italy
[9] AUSL 2 Umbria, Programma Aziendale Screening, Perugia, Italy
[10] AUSL, Ctr Senol, Presidio Osped Maggiore, Bologna, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2010年 / 115卷 / 04期
关键词
Breast cancer; Mammography; Diagnosis; Computer aided diagnosis; BREAST-CANCER DETECTION; SCREENING MAMMOGRAMS; RECALL RATES; STANDARD;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-010-0505-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) has been extensively reported to increase sensitivity by about 10% when added to a single reading while increasing recall rate by 12%, and its current use can be safely recommended in clinical practice. CAD has been suggested as a possible alternative to conventional double reading in screening. Uncontrolled comparison is consistent and suggests that CAD is comparable to double reading in incremental cancer detection rate (CAD +10.6%, double reading +9.1%) and possibly better in recall rate (CAD +12.5%, double reading +28.8%). However, controlled studies comparing single reading + CAD to conventional double reading are not consistent and on average suggest a lower cancer detection rate (-5.1%) and a lower recall rate (-9.8%) for CAD. Scientific evidence is not sufficient for a safe recommendation of single reading + CAD as a current alternative to conventional double reading.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 570
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] THE EFFICACY OF DOUBLE READING MAMMOGRAMS IN BREAST SCREENING
    ANDERSON, EDC
    MUIR, BB
    WALSH, JS
    KIRKPATRICK, AE
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1994, 49 (04) : 248 - 251
  • [2] CAD systems for mammography: A real opportunity? A review of the literature
    Bazzocchi M.
    Mazzarella F.
    Del Frate C.
    Girometti F.
    Zuiani C.
    [J]. La radiologia medica, 2007, 112 (3) : 329 - 353
  • [3] Bazzocchi M, 2001, Radiol Med, V101, P334
  • [4] Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting
    Birdwell, RL
    Bandodkar, P
    Ikeda, DM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 236 (02) : 451 - 457
  • [5] Second reading of screening mammograms increases cancer detection and recall rates. Results in the Florence screening programme
    Ciatto, S
    Ambrogetti, D
    Bonardi, R
    Catarzi, S
    Risso, G
    Del Turco, MR
    Mantellini, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2005, 12 (02) : 103 - 106
  • [6] Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review
    Ciatto, S
    Del Turco, MR
    Burke, P
    Visioli, C
    Paci, E
    Zappa, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (09) : 1645 - 1649
  • [7] Comparison of standard reading and computer aided detection (CAD) on a national proficiency test of screening mammography
    Ciatto, S
    Del Turco, MR
    Risso, G
    Catarzi, S
    Bonardi, R
    Viterbo, V
    Gnutti, P
    Guglielmoni, B
    Pinelli, L
    Pandiscia, A
    Navarra, F
    Lauria, A
    Palmiero, R
    Indovina, PL
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 45 (02) : 135 - 138
  • [8] Computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) in mammography: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of a new algorithm (CyclopusA®, Medicad) with two commercial systems
    Ciatto, S.
    Cascio, D.
    Fauci, F.
    Magro, R.
    Raso, G.
    Ienzi, R.
    Martinelli, F.
    Simone, M. Vasile
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2009, 114 (04): : 626 - 635
  • [9] Ciatto Stefano, 2004, Radiol Med, V107, P480
  • [10] Ciatto Stefano, 2003, Radiol Med, V106, P59