Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) and market efficiency of China’s commercial banks under market competition

被引:0
作者
Li Ji
Yanan Sun
Jiawei Liu
Yung-ho Chiu
机构
[1] Nantong University,School of Economics and Management
[2] Soochow University,Department of Economics
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2023年 / 30卷
关键词
ESG; Bank; Sustainability; Two-stage SBM; DEA; Exogenous variables;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As the leading financial institutions in China, it is crucial for commercial banks to pay attention to environmental protection (E), social responsibility (S), and corporate governance (G) in order to enhance operational efficiency and to advance the high-quality development of the country’s social economy. This research explores the market share of banks as exogenous variables in the profit stage and the market and sustainability stage to investigate the efficiency of 20 listed banks in China over 2016–2020 and innovatively incorporates indicators such as green credit, social giving, executive compensation, and ESG score into the meta-dynamic two-stage SBM under the exogenous variable DEA model. The results demonstrate the following. (1) By integrating market share as an exogenous variable in the model, the efficiency estimate is more precise. (2) In overall, UCBs are the most efficient type of banks, JSCBs are the second, SOCBs are the least efficient. All three types of banks are more efficient in profit stage versus the market and sustainability stage, JSCBs perform best in the profit stage, where SOCBs perform best in the market and sustainability stage. The three different bank types’ TGR performance is comparable to their efficiency value performance. (3) SOCBs lead in ESG investment and have the best ESG performance due to their distinct state-owned background. With their ongoing dedication to profit maximization and disregard for social responsibility and sustainable development, JSCBs have the worst ESG performance. (4) Policy recommendations are made based on the study’s findings for commercial banks, stakeholders, and regulators to support ESG investment and to bring about long-term sustainable development. Finally, as ESG develops in China, future research can consider longer time scales and larger perspectives to investigate the sustainability efficiency of commercial banks themselves, as well as their role in the local economy and industrial transformation.
引用
收藏
页码:24533 / 24552
页数:19
相关论文
共 205 条
[51]  
Chouaibi J(2003)Two-stage DEA: an application to major league baseball J Prod Anal 19 227-252
[52]  
Rossi M(2015)Defining CSR: problems and solutions J Bus Ethics 131 625-156
[53]  
Di Tommaso C(2016)To engage or not to engage in corporate social responsibility: empirical evidence from global banking sector Econ Model 55 207-131
[54]  
Thornton J(2022)Digital economy and ecological performance: evidence from a spatial panel data in China Front Environ Sci 10 1618-20
[55]  
Farrell MJ(2021)The impact of gross domestic product on the financing and investment efficiency of China’s commercial banks Financ Innov 7 35-637
[56]  
Finger M(2018)Does CEO gender matter for bank risk? Econ Syst 42 64-1782
[57]  
Gavious I(2004)The determinants of European bank profitability Int Bus Econ Res J 3 57-72
[58]  
Manos R(2009)Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries Energy Policy 37 246-311
[59]  
Forster J(2022)The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: the mediating role of financial constraints and managers’ environmental awareness Technol Soc 68 101906-undefined
[60]  
Shaffer S(2022)Environmental finance: an interdisciplinary review Technol Forecast Soc Chang 179 121639-undefined