Physical literacy and inclusion: A scoping review of the physical literacy literature inclusive of individuals experiencing disability

被引：0
作者：
Pushkarenko K. [1 ,2 ]
Causgrove Dunn J. [1 ]
Wohlers B. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton
[2] School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL
来源：
PROSPECTS | 2021年 / 50卷 / 1-2期
关键词：
Disability; Inclusion; Physical literacy; Scoping review;
D O I：
10.1007/s11125-020-09497-8
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Although inclusion is a fundamental tenet of physical literacy (PL), its applicability and inclusivity related to individuals experiencing disability has been assumed but is not well understood. The purpose of this article is to gain a better understanding of the literature pertaining to the inclusiveness of PL for individuals experiencing disability. Following the analysis of 24 pieces of literature published between January 2001 and May 2019, the main findings include: Overall, PL for individuals experiencing disability has been primarily discussed through a lens of ableism, using a narrow perspective, and at a superficial level, though recent discussions have become increasingly representative of contemporary perspectives on disability. Although encouraging, the collective findings reveal an ongoing need to address current assumptions surrounding disability in order to establish meaningful physical activity experiences that are of value to individuals with diverse capabilities, and to create inclusive PL programming that is welcoming and affirming for all. © 2020, UNESCO IBE.
引用
收藏
页码：107 / 126
页数：19
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Almond L., Whitehead M., Physical literacy: Clarifying the nature of the concept, Physical Education Matters, 7, pp. 68-71, (2012)
[2]  
Alpous A., Longmuir P.E., Canadian physical literacy (CaPL) screen: Simple, quick, and accurate identification of children with important physical literacy deficits. 2016 North American Society for Paediatric Exercise Medicine (NASPEM) biennial meeting, Knoxville, Tennessee. Pediatric Exercise Science, 28, 16, (2016)
[3]  
Arbour-Nicitopoulos K.P., Boross-Harmer A., Leo J., Allison A., Bremner R., Taverna F., Sora D., Wright F.V., Igniting fitness possibilities: A case study of an inclusive community-based physical literacy program for children and youth, Leisure/Loisir, Journal of the Canadian Association for Leisure Studies, 42, pp. 69-92, (2018)
[4]  
Arbour-Nicitopoulos K., Shirazipour C., Sweatman M., Seaman R., The secret of S.M.I.L.E.: Best practices for delivering adapted physical activity programming, Physical & Health Education Journal, 83, 4, pp. 1-30, (2017)
[5]  
Arksey H., O'Malley L., Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, pp. 19-32, (2005)
[6]  
Barber W., Inclusive and accessible physical education: Rethinking ability and disability in pre-service teacher education, Sport, Education and Society, 23, 6, pp. 1-13, (2016)
[7]  
Barber W., Robertson L., Walters B., Whent G., Inclusive and accessible physical education for diverse populations, Educators on diversity, social justice, and schooling: A reader, (2018)
[8]  
Bedell G., Coster W., Law M., Liljenquist K., Kao Y., Teplicky R., Anaby D., Alunkal Khetani M., Community participation, supports, and barriers of school-age children with and without disabilities, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, pp. 315-323, (2013)
[9]  
Beets M.W., Cardinal B.J., Alderman B.L., Parental social support and the physical activity-related behaviors of youth: A review, Health Education & Behavior, 37, pp. 621-644, (2010)
[10]  
Block M.E., Taliaferro A., Moran T., Physical activity and youth with disabilities: Barriers and supports, The Prevention Researcher, 20, pp. 18-21, (2013)
12345678