Belief Revision And Epistemology

被引:0
作者
John L. Pollock
Anthony S. Gillies
机构
[1] University of Arizona,Department of Philosophy
来源
Synthese | 2000年 / 122卷
关键词
Belief Revision; Logical Relation; Revision Operator; Proper Account; Postulational Theory;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Postulational approaches attempt to understand the dynamics of belief revision by appealing to no more than the set of beliefs held by an agent and the logical relations between them. It is argued there that such an approach cannot work. A proper account of belief revision must also appeal to the arguments supporting beliefs, and recognize that those arguments can be defeasible. If we begin with a mature epistemological theory that accommodates this, it can be seen that the belief revision operators on which the postulational theories are based are ill-defined. It is further argued that there is no way to repair the definitions so as to retain the spirit of those theory. Belief revision is better studied from within an independently motivated epistemological theory.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 92
页数:23
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Alchourrón C. E.(1985)On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Functions for Contraction and Revision Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 510-30
[2]  
Gärdenfors P.(1982)The Logic of Theory Change: Contraction Functions and Their Associated Revision Functions Theoria 48 14-37
[3]  
Makinson D.(1985)On the Logic of Theory Change: Safe Contraction Studia Logica 44 405-22
[4]  
Alchourrón C. E.(1994)Unifying Default Reasoning and Belief Revision in a Modal Framework Artificial Intelligence 68 33-85
[5]  
Makinson D.(1997)On the Logic of Iterated Belief Revision Artificial Intelligence 89 1-29
[6]  
Alchourrón C. F.(1991)Theory Contraction Through Base Contraction Journal of Philosophical Logic 20 510-30
[7]  
Makinson D.(1988)Iteration of Conditionals and the Ramsey Test Synthese 76 49-81
[8]  
Boutilier C.(1987)Defeasible Reasornng Cognitive Science 11 481-518
[9]  
Darwiche A.(1992)How to Reason Defeasibly Artificial Intelligence 57 1-42
[10]  
Pearl J.(1997)Reasoning about Change and Persistence: A Solution to the Frame Problem Nous 31 143-169