Optimal placement of flexible ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery

被引:0
作者
Yujun Chen
Xiaofeng Cheng
Heng Yang
Wen Deng
Luyao Chen
Gongxian Wang
Xiaochen Zhou
机构
[1] The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University,Department of Urology
来源
Urolithiasis | / 51卷
关键词
Ureteral access sheath; Retrograde intrarenal surgery; Ureteroscopy; Stone fragments;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aims to explore the optimal location of flexible ureteral access sheath (f-UAS) in retrograde intrarenal lithotripsy (RIRS). RIRS model was built by AutoCAD 2011 software, and imported COMSOL 5.6 software to computer simulation. An RIRS model was constructed in vitro to analyze the distribution pattern of stone fragments and compare the weight of stone fragments carried out by the irrigation fluid when the f-UAS is in different positions. Computer simulation showed that the highest flow of irrigation fluid was in the channel of flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) and in the lumen of f-UAS. From the f-URS to the renal collection system and then to the f-UAS, the velocity of irrigation fluid changes gradually from high-flow to low-flow and then to high-flow. When the f-URS and the f-UAS are at the same level, the irrigation fluid is always at a state of high flow during the process from f-URS to f-UAS. When the f-URS and the f-UAS are at the same level, it can increase the local intrarenal pressure (IRP) at the front of f-URS. The stone fragments are mainly sediment in the low-flow region of irrigation fluid. More stone fragments could follow the irrigation fluid out of the body when the tip of f-URS and the tip of f-UAS are at the same level (P < 0.001). The f-UAS should be brought closer to the stone in RIRS. And more stone fragments can be taken out of the body by the effect of irrigation fluid.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Komeya M(2021)Gap between UAS and ureteroscope predicts renal stone-free rate after flexible ureteroscopy with the fragmentation technique World J Urol 39 2733-2739
[2]  
Odaka H(2019)Suctioning ureteral access sheath use in flexible ureteroscopy might decrease operation time and prevent infectious complications World J Urol 37 393-394
[3]  
Watanabe T(2003)Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths Urology 61 713-718
[4]  
Tonyali S(2019)In Vivo the effect of irrigation power and ureteral access sheath diameter on the maximal intra-pelvic pressure during ureteroscopy: experimental study in a live anesthetized pig J Endourol 33 725-729
[5]  
Rehman J(2022)European association of urology section of urolithiasis and international alliance of urolithiasis joint consensus on retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of renal stones Eur Urol Focus 8 1461-1468
[6]  
Monga M(2021)Intrarenal pressure: what is acceptable for flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Eur Urol Focus 7 31-33
[7]  
Landman J(2018)A simple fluid dynamic model of renal pelvis pressures during ureteroscopic kidney stone treatment PLoS ONE 13 32-394
[8]  
Noureldin Y(2017)To dust or not to dust: a systematic review of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy techniques Curr Urol Rep 18 391-5
[9]  
Kallidonis P(2019)Role of ‘dusting and pop-dusting’ using a high-powered (100 W) laser machine in the treatment of large stones (≥ 15 mm): prospective outcomes over 16 months Urolithiasis 47 1-134
[10]  
Ntasiotis P(2019)The fate of residual fragments after retrograde intrarenal surgery in long-term follow-up Urol J 16 129-588