Making fathers: Black men's response to fatherhood initiatives

被引:0
作者
Jordan-Zachery J.S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Political Science, Black Studies Program, Providence College, Providence, RI 02918
关键词
African American men; Fatherhood initiatives; Interpretive phenomenological analysis; Policy analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s12111-008-9085-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Policy makers are cognizant that ending welfare as we know it will not translate into the end of poverty among solo-mothering families. Thus, they have focused on promoting marriage and fatherhood among what are now termed "fragile families". The purpose of this study is to describe the lived experiences of Black men, who are among the targets of fatherhood and marriage promotion programs. To accomplish this goal, this exploratory study relies on a phenomenological approach. The value of employing this approach is that it is suitable for excavating and surfacing deep issues. More importantly, a phenomenological approach is key to giving voice to those who are often silenced and or rendered invisible in the policy making process. I employ in-depth interviews to help us better understand men's lived experiences with fatherhood. In-depth interviews of participants and non-participants of fatherhood programs further our comprehension: on how Black men view the role of fathers; what obstacles are confronted that might prohibit these individuals from maintaining relationships with their children; and whether the promotion of paternal relations over content provides stability for these families. By centering the voices of these men, our theoretical understandings and our policy prescriptives would be enhanced. © 2009 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 218
页数:19
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Barritt L., Human science and the human image, Phenomenology and Pedagogy, 4, 3, pp. 14-21, (1986)
[2]  
Boyd C.O., Phenomenology the method, Nursing Research: A Qualitative Perspective (3rd. Ed.), (2001)
[3]  
Creswell J.W., Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions, (1998)
[4]  
Dion M.R., Healthy marriage programs: Learning what works, The Future of Children: Marriage and Child Wellbeing, 15, 2, pp. 139-156, (2005)
[5]  
Edin K., Single mothers and child support: Possibilities and limits of child support policy, Children and Youth Services Review, 17, 1-2, pp. 203-230, (1995)
[6]  
Edin K., The myths of dependency and self-sufficiency: Women, welfare, and low-wage work, Focus (San Franc. Calif.), 17, 2, pp. 1-9, (1995)
[7]  
Edin K., Reed J.M., Why don't they just get married? Barriers to marriage among the disadvantaged, The Future of Children: Marriage and Child Wellbeing, 15, 2, pp. 117-137, (2005)
[8]  
Garfinkel I., Meyer D.R., McLanahan S.S., A brief history of child support policies in the United States, Fathers under Fire: The Revolution in Child Support Enforcement, (1998)
[9]  
Gavanas A., Fatherhood Politics in the United States: Masculinity, Sexuality Race and Marriage, (2004)
[10]  
Gerson K., No Man'S Land: Men'S Changing Commitments to Family and Work, (1993)