Image Tracking System. A new technique for safe and cost-effective laparoscopic surgery [Image Tracking System: Eine neue Technik für die sichere und kostensparende laparoskopische Operation]

被引：0

作者：

Niebuhr H. ^{[1
,2
]}

Born O. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Chirurgische Abteilung, Evangelisches Krankhs. Alsterdorf, Hamburg

[2] Chirurgische Abteilung, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Alsterdorf, 22337 Hamburg

来源：

Der Chirurg | 2000年 / 71卷 / 5期

关键词：

Image Tracking System; Laparoscopic surgery; Robotic system; Solo surgery;

D O I：

10.1007/s001040050861

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The potential for improvement of the results of laparoscopic operations as well as necessity of enhanced efficiency in the health-care systems are the main reasons for development and practical use of robotic systems in the field of laparoscopic surgery. While robotic systems imitate the human camera-holder the Image Tracking System (ImagTrac, Olympus,Tokio) is based on another principle: A voice-activated zoom function allows change between overview and detailed view. In the zoom-in position it is possible to select four different fields of view. The results of a clinical trial with control group show that the system: 1. Makes it possible to dispense with the human camera-holder without compromising patient safety, sometimes at greater convenience to the surgeon. 2. Makes it possible for routine laparoscopic operations such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic hernia repair to be performed (as solo surgery) by a team of a surgeon and a nurse only. 3. Is more cost-effective than robotic systems with a similar range of features.

引用

页码：580 / 584

页数：4

共 12 条

[1]

Begin E., Gagner M., Hurteau R., De Santis S., Pomp A., A robotic camera for laparoscopic surgery: Conception and experimental results, Surg Laparosc Endosc, 5, (1995)

[2]

Buckingham R.A., Buckingham R.O., Robots in operating theatres, B M J, 311, (1995)

[3]

Cadeddu J.A., Stoianovici D., Kavoussi L.R., Robotic surgery in urology, Urol Clin North Am, 25, (1998)

[4]

Garcia-Ruiz A., Gagner M., Miller J.H., Steiner C.P., Hahn J.F., Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks, Arch Surg, 133, (1998)

[5]

Kavoussi L.R., Moore R.G., Adams J.B., Partin A.W., Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control, J Urol, 154, (1995)

[6]

Lea J.T., Watkins D., Mills A., Peshkin M.A., Et al., Registration and immobilization in robot-assisted surgery, J Image Guid Surg, 1, (1995)

[7]

Margossian H., Garcia-Ruiz A., Falcone T., Goldberg J.M., Et al., Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical uterine horn anastomosis, Fertil Steril, 70, (1998)

[8]

Mettler L., Ibrahim M., Jonat W., One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaecological endoscopie surgery, Hum Reprod, 13, (1998)

[9]

Nagy A.G., Patterson E.J., Buczkowski A.K., Zack B., Scudamore C.H., Application of robotic and prerobotic devices in laparoscopic surgery, J Invest Surg, 10, (1997)

[10]

Partin A.W., Adams J.B., Moore R.G., Kavoussi L.R., Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: A preliminary report, J Am Coll Surg, 181, (1995)

← 1 2 →