Three-way decision model under a large-scale group decision-making environment with detecting and managing non-cooperative behaviors in consensus reaching process

被引:0
作者
Prasenjit Mandal
Sovan Samanta
Madhumangal Pal
A. S. Ranadive
机构
[1] Vidyasagar University,Department of Applied Mathematics with Oceanology and Computer Programming
[2] Tamralipta Mahavidyalaya,Department of Mathematics
[3] Guru Ghasidas University,Department of Pure and Applied Mathematics
来源
Artificial Intelligence Review | 2022年 / 55卷
关键词
Linguistic terms; Decision-theoretic rough sets; Three-way decisions; Large-scale group decision making;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Aiming of this paper is to introduce large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) into three-way decisions (3WDs) with decision-theoretic rough sets (DTRSs) and propose LSGDM based 3WDs under linguistic assessments. There are two parameters involved of the 3WDs with DTRSs such as conditional probability and loss functions. Here we mainly focus on the calculation of loss function using LSGDM approach. LSGDM problem is characterized by a large number of experts, multiple clusters and a mass of evaluation data given by the experts. In some cases, experts are unwilling to revise their opinions to reach a consensus. So, the proper management of experts opinions and their non-cooperative behaviors (NCBs) is necessary to establish a consensus model. An appropriate adjustment of the credibility information is also essential. Using the clustering method, the proposed model divides the experts with similar evaluations into a subgroup. In each cluster, the experts’ opinions are then aggregate. In order to measure the level of consensus among clusters, the cluster consensus index (CCI) and group consensus index (GCI) have been developed. Then, using a tool for managing the NCBs of clusters includes two components: (1) for identifying the NCBs of clusters, NCB degree has defined using CCI and GCI; (2) for consensus improvement, implemented the weight punishment mechanism to NCBs clusters. Finally, we have designed a rule for classifying the objects into three regions, and the associated cost of each object is derived for ranking the objects in each region. An example is offered for selection of the Energy project to show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
引用
收藏
页码:5517 / 5542
页数:25
相关论文
共 197 条
[21]  
Liu S(2008)Multi-criteria human resource allocation for solving multistage combinatorial optimization problems using multiobjective hybrid genetic algorithm Expert Syst 34 2480-50
[22]  
Liu Y(2011)A risk evaluation method for the high-tech projectinvestment based on uncertain linguistic variables Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78 40-132
[23]  
Herrera F(2012)Three-way government decision analysis with decision-theoretic rough sets Internat J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst 20 119-130
[24]  
Herrera-Viedma E(2014)A partial binary tree DEA-DA cyclic classification model for decision makers in complex multi-attribute large-group interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making problems Inf Fus 18 119-447
[25]  
Verdegay JL(2017)Group decision making based on heterogeneous preference relations with self-confidence Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 16 429-73
[26]  
Herrera-Viedma E(2018)Managing consensus and self-confidence in multiplicative preference relations in group decision making Knowl-Based Syst 162 62-256
[27]  
Alonso S(2019)Consensus model for large-scale group decision making based on fuzzy preference relation with self-confidence: detecting and managing overconfidence behaviors Inf Fus 52 245-946
[28]  
Chiclana F(2019)Analysis of self-confidence indices-based additive consistency for fuzzy preference relations with self-confidence and its application in group decision making Int J Intell Syst 34 920-203
[29]  
Herrera F(2019)A group decision making approach considering self-confidence behaviors and its application in environmental pollution emergency management Int J Environ Res Public Health 16 385-2179
[30]  
Hu QH(2020)A multiple attribute decision making three way model for intuitionistic fuzzy numbers Int J Approximate Reason 119 177-714