Melanoma gene expression and clinical course

被引:0
作者
M. Vourc’h-Jourdain
C. Volteau
J. M. Nguyen
A. Khammari
Brigitte Dreno
机构
[1] Unit of Skin Cancer Nantes University Hospital,
[2] INSERM U 892,undefined
[3] CIC Biothérapie,undefined
[4] PIMESP (Pole d’Information Médicale,undefined
[5] et d’Evaluation en Santé Publique),undefined
来源
Archives of Dermatological Research | 2009年 / 301卷
关键词
Melanoma antigen-encoding genes; Melanoma; Survival; Prognosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Evidence for the in vitro lymphocyte response against autologous melanoma has been accumulating over the past 10 years, leading to the identification of numerous melanoma-associated antigens recognised by T cells. These antigens are targets for specific immunotherapy protocols. However, their expression is heterogeneous during tumour progression and may contribute to therapeutic escape mechanisms and disease progression. This study was designed to chart the importance of these escape mechanisms, and to assess the relationship between gene expression and the clinical profile (especially survival data) of patients with melanoma. We studied the expression of certain melanoma genes in tissue biopsies from 202 patients using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The evaluated genes were Melan-A, tyrosinase, Na-17A, MAGE-1, MAGE-3 and Ny-ESO-1. We then correlated the results to the patients’ survival data. 202 samples (cutaneous, nodal and visceral biopsies) were analysed by RT-PCR. No relationship was found between clinical data and gene expression. No relationship was found between survival data and gene expression, when samples of all stages were combined in the analysis. However, interactions between gene expression and disease stage were significant. When stage III samples alone were considered, MAGE-3 expression alone or in association with the expression of the other tumour-specific genes was found to be significantly associated with a higher disease-free survival (respectively, P = 0.0349; 0.007). Our results provided no evidence for a relationship between gene expression and clinical data, or between gene expression and survival data. However, with regard to certain sub-groups, such as stage III samples, tumour gene expression was significantly associated with survival.
引用
收藏
页码:673 / 679
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Balch CM(2001)Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma J Clin Oncol 19 3635-3648
[2]  
Buzaid AC(2006)Tumor antigen expression in melanoma varies according to antigen and stage Clin Cancer Res 12 673-678
[3]  
Soong SJ(2000)Site-specific risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma and pattern of sun exposure in New Zealand Int J Cancer 85 627-632
[4]  
Barrow C(2001)Expression of gp100, MART-1, tyrosinase, and S100 in paraffin-embedded primary melanomas and locoregional, lymph node, and visceral metastases: implications for diagnosis and immunotherapy. A study conducted by the EORTC Melanoma Cooperative Group J Pathol 193 13-20
[5]  
Browning J(2004)Molecular detection of MART1, tyrosinase and MIA in peripheral blood, lymph nodes and metastatic sites of stage III/IV melanoma patients Melanoma Res 14 361-365
[6]  
Macgregor D(1998)RT-PCR tyrosinase–mRNA–positive cells in peripheral blood: evaluation strategy and correlation with known prognostic markers in 123 melanoma patients J Invest Dermatol 110 263-267
[7]  
Bulliard JL(1999)Active specific immunotherapy with polyvalent melanoma cell vaccine for patients with in-transit melanoma metastases Cancer 85 2160-2169
[8]  
De Vries JJ(1997)Immunoselection in vivo: independent loss of CMH class I and melanocyte differentiation antigen expression in metastatic melanoma Int J Cancer 71 142-147
[9]  
Smeets M(1996)Granulocyte–macrophage-colony-stimulating factor enhances immune responses to melanoma-associated peptides in vivo Int J Cancer 67 54-62
[10]  
de Graaf R(1996)Vaccine therapy for malignant melanoma CA Cancer J Clin 46 225-244