A method for segmentation of dental implants and crestal bone

被引:0
作者
Pedro Cunha
Miguel A. Guevara
Ana Messias
Salomão Rocha
Rita Reis
Pedro M. G. Nicolau
机构
[1] University of Porto,LOME
[2] University of Coimbra,Laboratory of Optics and Experimental Mechanics, INEGI
来源
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | 2013年 / 8卷
关键词
Segmentation; Dental implants; Crestal bone line; Mathematical morphology; Deformable models;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose   Medical imaging and in particular digital radiographic images offer a great deal of information to dentists in the clinical diagnosis and treatment processes on a daily basis. This paper presents a new method aimed to produce an accurate segmentation of dental implants and the crestal bone line in radiographic images. With this, it is possible computing several measures to biomechanical and clinical evaluation of dental implants positioning and evolution. Methods   The proposed segmentation method includes two major steps: (1) the preprocessing that combine denoising filters, morphological operations and histogram threshold techniques and (2) the final segmentation involving made-to-measure adjusted and trained active shape models for detecting the precise location of the intended structures. Results   Resulting measurements were compared to manual measurements made by experts on representative radiographs from patients. The calculated intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.75 and showed good reliability of the method, and the Bland-Altman analysis showed 95 % of the values within the limits of agreement. The mean of the differences between the manual and method-driven measurements was 0.049 mm (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-0.137; -0.040$$\end{document}) 95 % CI, inferior to the established limit (0.15mm). Conclusions   It was demonstrated that the method achieved a precise segmentation of the intended structures. The validation process on standardized periapical radiographs showed good agreement between the manual measurements and the ones produced by the new method. Future work will be focused on making the method more robust to densitometry changes and to validate the method on non-standardized radiographs.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 721
页数:10
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Hermann JS(2001)Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16 475-485
[2]  
Schoolfield JD(2012)A comparison of peripheral marginal bone loss at dental implants measured with conventional intraoral film and digitized radiographs J Oral Implantol 38 211-219
[3]  
Nummikoski PV(2000)A modular software system for computer-aided surgery and its first application in oral implantology IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19 616-620
[4]  
Buser D(2007)Computer methods for automating preoperative dental implant planning: implant positioning and size assignment Comput Methods Programs Biomed 86 30-38
[5]  
Schenk RK(2010)Evaluation of the difference in accuracy between implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates versus the conventional free-hand method-a combined in vivo-in vitro technique using cone-beam CT (Part II) J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 38 488-493
[6]  
Cochran DL(2010)An alternative method to match planned and achieved positions of implants, after virtual planning using cone-beam CT data and surgical guide templates–a method reducing patient radiation exposure (part I) J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 38 436-440
[7]  
Kamburoglu K(1986)A computational approach to edge detection IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 6 679-698
[8]  
Gulsahi A(1975)A survey of edge detection techniques Comput Graphics Image Process 4 248-270
[9]  
Genc Y(1979)A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9 62-66
[10]  
Paksoy CS(1993)An analysis of histogram-based thresholding algorithms CVGIP Graph Models Image Process 55 532-537