Scientists’ perceptions of the social and political implications of their research

被引:0
作者
Henry Small
Ann Kushmerick
Doug Benson
机构
[1] Thomson Scientific,
来源
Scientometrics | 2008年 / 74卷
关键词
Social Impact; Pandemic Influenza; Social Implication; Public Understanding; Political Implication;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We explore an empirical approach to studying the social and political implications of science by gathering scientists’ perceptions of the social impacts of their research. It was found that 78 percent of surveyed scientists from a variety of fields responding to a survey indicated that the research performed in connection with a recent highly cited paper had such implications. Health related implications were the most common, but other types of implications encountered were technological spin-offs, public understanding, economic and policy benefits. Surprisingly many scientists considered the advancement of science itself to be a social implication of their research. The relations of these implications to the field and topics of research are examined, and a mapping of implications gives an overview of the major dimensions of the social impacts of science.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 221
页数:14
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Barns I. J.(1996)Scientists and the broader community International Journal of Environment and Pollution 6 142-148
[2]  
Wilson S. A.(1968)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scale disagreement or partial credit Psychological Bulletin 70 213-220
[3]  
Cohen J.(1981)Citation Classics: four years of the human side of science Current Contents 22 5-16
[4]  
Garfield E.(2003)Diminishing returns? The costs and benefits of improving health Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 46 S108-S128
[5]  
Murphy K.(1997)The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science Research Policy 26 317-330
[6]  
Topel R.(1989)Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments Journal of Marketing Research 26 135-148
[7]  
Narin F.(1976)Extrinsic value theory for basic and applied research Policy Studies Journal 5 160-168
[8]  
Hamilton K. S.(2004)Why authors think their papers are highly cited Scientometrics 60 305-316
[9]  
Olivastro D.(2006)Tracking and predicting growth areas in science Scientometrics 68 595-610
[10]  
Perreault W. D.(1963)Criteria for scientific choice Minerva 1 159-171