Innovative anchorage alternatives for molar distalization - An overview; [Innovative Verankerungsalternativen zur Molarendistalisation im Oberkiefer - Eine Übersicht]

被引：19
作者：
Kinzinger G. [1 ]
Wehrbein H. [2 ]
Byloff F.K. [3 ]
Yildizhan F. [1 ]
Diedrich P. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Orthodontics, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen
[2] Department of Orthodontics, University of Mainz, Mainz
[3] Department of Orthodontics, University of Geneva, Geneva
来源：
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | 2005年 / 66卷 / 5期
关键词：
Anchorage; Compression spring systems; Molar distalization; Orthodontic implants; Pendulum appliance;
D O I：
10.1007/s00056-005-0512-6
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The conventional anchorage design of an appliance for non-compliance molar distalization anchored exclusively intraorally combines an acrylic pad or button placed on the palatal mucosa with involvment of the anchoring-teeth's periodontium. Disadvantages of this anchorage design include the difficulties it causes for proper oral hygiene, reactive forces and moments exerted on the anterior dentition, and relative contraindications based on certain dentition stages and local conditions. In this article we describe alternative anchorage designs, concentrating on types of anchorage that are applied with orthodontic anchoring implants of reduced diameter and length. Such implants offer several key advantages be yond that of facilitating proper hygiene, namely that they cause fewer or no side-effects in the anterior maxillary dentition area, and that a wider range of indications apply to children, adolescents and adults. © Urban & Vogel München 2005.
引用
收藏
页码：397 / 413
页数：16
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
Bernhart T., Vollgruber A., Gahleitner A., Et al., Alternative to the median region of the palate for placement of an orthodontic implant, Clin. Oral. Implants. Res., 11, pp. 595-601, (2000)
[2]  
Blechman A.M., Magnetic force systems in orthodontics, Am. J. Orthod., 87, pp. 201-210, (1985)
[3]  
Bolla E., Muratore F., Carano A., Et al., Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: A comparison with other contemporary methods, Angle Orthod., 72, pp. 481-494, (2002)
[4]  
Bondemark L., Kurol J., Distalization of maxillary first and second molars simultaneously with repelling magnets, Eur. J. Orthod., 14, pp. 264-272, (1992)
[5]  
Bondemark L., Kurol J., Bernhold M., Repelling magnets versus superelastic nickel-titanium coils in simultaneous distal movement of maxillary first and second molars, Angle Orthod., 64, pp. 189-198, (1994)
[6]  
Bondemark L., Kurol J., Class II correction with magnets and super-elastic coils followed by straight-wire mechanotherapy, J. Orofac. Orthop., 59, pp. 127-138, (1998)
[7]  
Bowman S.J., Modifications of the distal jet, J. Clin. Orthod., 32, pp. 549-556, (1998)
[8]  
Brender D., Thole M., Wehrbein H., Skelettale Verankerung in der Kieferorthopädie, Der Freie Zahnarzt, 48, pp. 22-28, (2004)
[9]  
Brickman C.D., Sinha P.K., Nanda R.S., Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop., 118, pp. 526-534, (2000)
[10]  
Bussick T.J., McNamara Jr. J.A., Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop., 117, pp. 333-343, (2000)
12345678910