Socioeconomic effectiveness and “green” growth of regional forest use

被引:5
作者
Glazyrina I.P. [1 ,2 ]
Faleichik L.M. [1 ,2 ]
Yakovleva K.A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chita
[2] Transbaikal State University, Chita
关键词
ecointensity; forest use; natural assets; green” economy; green” growth;
D O I
10.1134/S1875372815040022
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Presented is the model for analysis of ecologo-economic processes in terms of “green” economy. The model was built upon P. Victor’s conceptual scheme. The key parameters are represented by the specific indicators of impact on natural systems per unit of economic result. The model was used in investigating the processes of forest use at the level of regions of Russia. Analysis showed that most of the regions with high indicators of budgetary and socioeconomic effectiveness as well are holding the greatest promise for “green” growth. This indicates that if these indicators rather than the felling, export and processing volumes are used as the basis for the country’s forestry policy, then the relevant incentives thus created would encourage a further development of Russian forest use in the light of the principles of “green” economy. The findings intimate that the measures of state policy for improvements in forest use disregard the regional differences and are insufficiently effective for regions where the geographical and infrastructural conditions are beneficial for fostering development of exports of raw wood and sawn timber subjected to rough conversion. According to our calculations, an enhancement in effectiveness of forest use is also feasible without any additional load pressure on ecosystems through rational utilization of forest resources. © 2015, Pleiades Publishing, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 334
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Bobylev S.N., Economic Instability: A Chance for the “Green” Economy?, Report on Human Development in the Russian Federation for 2014, (2014)
  • [2] Daly H.E., Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development, (1996)
  • [3] Victor P.A., Growth, Degrowth and Climate Change: A Scenario Analysis, Ecological Economics, 84, pp. 206-212, (2012)
  • [4] O'Neill D.W., Measuring Progress in the Degrowth Transition to a Steady-State Economy, Ecological Economics, 84, pp. 221-231, (2012)
  • [5] Glazyrina I.P., Zabelina I.A., Klevakina E.A., The Ecological Component of Economic Development: Border Regions of Russia and China, EKO, 6, pp. 5-24, (2014)
  • [6] Glazyrina I.P., Potravny I.M., Ecological Indicators of the Quality of Growth of Regional Economy, (2006)
  • [7] Victor P.A., The Kenneth E. Boulding Memorial Award 2014: Ecological Economics: A Personal Journey?, Ecological Economics, 109, pp. 93-100, (2015)
  • [8] Antonova N.E., The Forestry Complex of the Far East: The Realities and Possibilities of the Russia-China Interaction, EKO, 6, pp. 40-55, (2014)
  • [9] Glazyrina I.P., Faleichik L.M., Natural Assets of the Region and the Russia-China Cross-Border Relations: Prospects and Risks, (2014)
  • [10] Kolesnikova A.V., Main problems and Challenges in the Development of the National Forestry Complex, EKO, 11, pp. 5-25, (2013)