The co-effects of query structure and expansion on retrieval performance in probabilistic text retrieval

被引:11
作者
Kekäläinen J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Information Studies, University of Tampere, Tampere
来源
Information Retrieval | 2000年 / 1卷 / 4期
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Concept-based query formulation; Query expansion; Query structures; Semantic conceptual relationships; Text retrieval;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009983401464
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The effects of query structures and query expansion (QE) on retrieval performance were tested with a best match retrieval system (InQuery1). Query structure means the use of operators to express the relations between search keys. Six different structures were tested, representing strong structures (e.g., queries with facets or concepts identified) and weak structures (no concepts identified, a query is 'a bag of search keys' ). QE was based on concepts, which were first selected from a searching thesaurus, and then expanded by semantic relationships given in the thesaurus. The expansion levels were (a) no expansion, (b) a synonym expansion, (c) a narrower concept expansion, (d) an associative concept expansion, and (e) a cumulative expansion of all other expansions. With weak structures and Boolean structured queries, QE was not very effective. The best performance was achieved with a combination of a facet structure, where search keys within a facet were treated as instances of one search key (the SYN operator), and the largest expansion. © 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 344
页数:15
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]  
Belkin N., Kantor P., Fox E.A., Shaw J.A., Combining evidence of multiple query representations for information retrieval, Information Processing and Management, 31, 3, pp. 431-448, (1995)
[2]  
Conover W.J., Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 2nd Ed., (1980)
[3]  
Efthimiadis E.N., Query expansion, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 31. Information Today, 31, pp. 121-187, (1996)
[4]  
Fidel R., Efthimiadis E.N., Terminological knowledge structure for intermediary expert systems, Information Processing & Management, 31, 1, pp. 15-27, (1995)
[5]  
Green R., The expression of conceptual syntagmatic relationships: A comparative survey, Journal of Documentation, 51, 4, pp. 315-338, (1995)