Inhibition in dot comparison tasks

被引:73
作者
Clayton S. [1 ]
Gilmore C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University, Loughborough
来源
ZDM | 2015年 / 47卷 / 5期
关键词
Approximate Number System; Dot comparison; Inhibition; Numerical cognition; Visual cues;
D O I
10.1007/s11858-014-0655-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Dot comparison tasks are commonly used to index an individual’s Approximate Number System (ANS) acuity, but the cognitive processes involved in completing these tasks are poorly understood. Here, we investigated how factors including numerosity ratio, set size and visual cues influence task performance. Forty-four children aged 7–9 years completed a dot comparison task with a range of to-be-compared numerosities. We found that as the size of the numerosities increased, with ratios held constant, accuracy decreased due to the heightened salience of incongruent visual information. Furthermore, in trials with larger numerosities participants’ accuracies were influenced more by the convex hull of the array than the average dot size. The numerosity ratio between the arrays in each trial was an important predictor for all set sizes. We argue that these findings are consistent with a ‘competing processes’ inhibition-based account, where accuracy scores are influenced by individual differences in both ANS acuity and inhibitory control skills. © 2014, FIZ Karlsruhe.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 770
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Banks J., Oldfield Z., Understanding pensions: Cognitive function, numerical ability and retirement saving, Fiscal Studies, 28, 2, pp. 143-170, (2007)
[2]  
Barbaresi W.J., Katusic S.K., Colligan R.C., Weaver A.L., Jacobsen S.J., Math learning disorder: Incidence in a population-based birth cohort, 1976–82, Rochester, Minn, Ambulatory Pediatrics, 5, 5, pp. 281-289, (2005)
[3]  
Baroody A.J., The development of adaptive expertise and flexibility: The integration of conceptual and procedural knowledge, The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise studies, pp. 1-33, (2003)
[4]  
Barth H., Beckmann L., Spelke E.S., Nonsymbolic, approximate arithmetic in children: Abstract addition prior to instruction, Developmental Psychology, 44, 5, pp. 1466-1477, (2008)
[5]  
Barth H., Kanwisher N., Spelke E.S., The construction of large number representations in adults, Cognition, 86, pp. 201-221, (2002)
[6]  
Barth H., La Mont K., Lipton J., Dehaene S., Kanwisher N., Spelke E., Nonsymbolic arithmetic in adults and young children, Cognition, 98, pp. 199-222, (2006)
[7]  
Barth H., La Mont K., Lipton J., Spelke E.S., Abstract number and arithmetic in preschool children, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, pp. 14116-14121, (2005)
[8]  
Blair C., Razza R.P., Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten, Child Development, 78, 2, pp. 647-663, (2007)
[9]  
Bull R., Espy K.A., Wiebe S.A., Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at age 7 years, Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 3, pp. 205-228, (2008)
[10]  
Bull R., Scerif G., Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching and working memory, Developmental Neuropsychology, 19, 3, pp. 273-293, (2001)