What More than Structure Do We Know?

被引:0
作者
S Siddharth
机构
[1] National Institute of Advanced Studies (A recognized research centre of University of Mysore),Consciousness Studies Programme
来源
Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research | 2020年 / 37卷
关键词
Structural realism; Newman’s objection; Consciousness; Conscious experience; Concreteness;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Structural realism is the view that scientific theories give us knowledge only of the structure of the unobservable world. The view faces an influential objection that was first posed by Max Newman: if our knowledge of the unobservable world were strictly limited to its structure, our knowledge turns out to be trivial, for it amounts to nothing more than knowledge of the cardinality of the world. In this paper, I shall propose a response to Newman’s objection. It shall be argued that in having epistemic access to the intrinsic nature of our conscious experiences—knowledge that structural realists allow for—we have knowledge of what it is to exist as concrete phenomena. With the plausible assumption that the relations of the unobservable world are also similarly concrete, one can address Newman’s objection. I shall further contrast this response to other similar responses that have been proposed, and also address the objection that this response is not available to structural realists.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 131
页数:16
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Ainsworth PM(2009)Newman’s objection British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 135-171
[2]  
Alter T(2012)What is Russellian monism? Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 67-95
[3]  
Nagasawa Y(1995)On a confusion about a function of consciousness Brain and Behavioral Sciences 18 227-247
[4]  
Block N(1995)Facing up to the problem of consciousness Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 200-219
[5]  
Chalmers DJ(1985)Bertrand Russell’s the analysis of matter: Its historical context and contemporary interest Philosophy of Science 52 621-639
[6]  
Demopoulos W(2011)Everything you always wanted to know about structural realism but were afraid to ask European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 227-276
[7]  
Friedman M(2017)Is it a problem that physics is mathematical? Journal of Consciousness Studies 24 50-58
[8]  
Frigg R(2004)Empirical adequacy and ramsification British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 287-300
[9]  
Votsis I(1998)Defining “Intrinsic” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 333-345
[10]  
Goff P(1983)New work for a theory of universals Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 343-377