Shift-work research: Where do we stand, where should we go?

Shift-work seriously affects the health and well-being of millions of people worldwide, and the number of shift workers is constantly rising (currently approximately 20% of the workforce). While some effects are acute, others lead to chronic syndromes that persist after retirement. Though health problems in shift workers are well established, we still do not properly understand the causal mechanisms underlying shift-work’s effects on health. One reason may be the heterogeneity in shift-work research design and methodology, rendering comparison between studies difficult or even impossible. Shift-work also involves a multitude of interacting factors, and we do not yet fully understand many of these interactions. Interindividual differences between workers are central predictors for health. Among these, individual differences in internal time (chronotype) should play a key role in a worker’s ability to adjust to shift-work. While the importance of chronotype is receiving increased attention in chronobiology, it is still being largely ignored by shift-work studies, particularly by those performed in the field. Shift-work research would greatly benefit from increased attention to circadian components in real-life shift-work situations. Here, we summarize the current state of shift-work research in an attempt to address the reasons as to why we still do not clearly understand the links between shift-work and health. The aim of shift-work research should ultimately be to improve health and well-being (including social issues) in shift workers by means of improved work schedules. Society as a whole would benefit from such improvements — the individual worker, the health system, and industry.