Specific patterns of XCO2 observed by GOSAT during 2009–2016 and assessed with model simulations over China

被引:0
作者
Nian Bie
Liping Lei
Zhonghua He
Zhaocheng Zeng
Liangyun Liu
Bing Zhang
Bofeng Cai
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Sciences,Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth
[2] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences
[3] California Institute of Technology,The Center for Climate Change and Environmental Policy
[4] Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning,undefined
[5] Ministry of Environmental Protection,undefined
来源
Science China Earth Sciences | 2020年 / 63卷
关键词
GEOS-Chem; GOSAT; OCO-2; Specific pattern; XCO;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Spatiotemporal patterns of column-averaged dry air mole fraction of CO2 (XCO2) have not been well characterized on a regional scale due to limitations in data availability and precision. This paper addresses these issues by examining such patterns in China using the long-term mapping XCO2 dataset (2009–2016) derived from the Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT). XCO2 simulations are also constructed using the high-resolution nested-grid GEOS-Chem model. The following results are found: Firstly, the correlation coefficient between the anthropogenic emissions and XCO2 spatial distribution is nearly zero in summer but up to 0.32 in autumn. Secondly, on average, XCO2 increases by 2.08 ppm every year from 2010 to 2015, with a sharp increase of 2.6 ppm in 2013. Lastly, in the analysis of three typical regions, the GOSAT XCO2 time series is in better agreement with the GEOS-Chem simulation of XCO2 in the Taklimakan Desert region (the least difference with bias 0.65±0.78 ppm), compared with the northern urban agglomeration region (−1.3±1.2 ppm) and the northeastern forest region (−1.4±1.4 ppm). The results are likely attributable to uncertainty in both the satellite-retrieved XCO2 data and the model simulation data.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 394
页数:10
相关论文
共 507 条
[1]  
Bie N(2018)Regional uncertainty of GOSAT XCO Atmos Meas Tech 11 1251-1272
[2]  
Lei L(2010) retrievals in China: Quantification and attribution Atmos Meas Tech 3 781-811
[3]  
Zeng Z C(2015)A remote sensing technique for global monitoring of power plant CO Remote Sens Environ 162 344-362
[4]  
Cai B(2014) emissions from space and related applications Energy Policy 66 557-567
[5]  
Yang S(2012)The greenhouse gas climate change initiative (GHG-CCI): Comparison and quality assessment of near-surface-sensitive satellite-derived CO J Geophys Res 117 D21301-707
[6]  
He Z(2008) and CH J Geophys Res 113 D05305-385
[7]  
Wu C(2012) global data sets Atmos Meas Tech 5 687-69
[8]  
Nassar R(2015)Urban CO IEEE J-STARS 8 376-3493
[9]  
Bovensmann H(2017) emissions in China: Spatial boundary and performance comparison Remote Sens 9 251-551
[10]  
Buchwitz M(2012)Atmospheric carbon dioxide retrieved from the greenhouse gases observing satellite (GOSAT): Comparison with ground-based TCCON observations and GEOS-Chem model calculations Remote Sens Environ 120 58-1417