The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges

被引:0
|
作者
Giacomo Grassi
Michel G. J. den Elzen
Andries F. Hof
Roberto Pilli
Sandro Federici
机构
[1] Joint Research Centre,European Commission
[2] Institute for Environment and Sustainability,Department of Climate, Air and Energy
[3] Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL),undefined
来源
Climatic Change | 2012年 / 115卷
关键词
Forest Management; Kyoto Protocol; Emission Level; Additional Action; Commitment Period;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Annex I Parties may receive credits or debits from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) activities, contributing to achieving individual emission reduction targets. In the Durban climate negotiations, Parties agreed new LULUCF accounting rules for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (CP2). By using these new rules, this paper presents key differences among Parties at the minimum (assuming no additional action) and potential (assuming additional actions) contribution of the forest-related LULUCF activities in achieving the pledges for 2020. Overall, the potential contribution of LULUCF is relatively modest (up to about 2 % of 1990 emissions) for the EU, the Annex I Parties likely joining the CP2, and for the Annex I Parties that joined the CP1 as a whole. However, for specific Parties, LULUCF can make a substantial contribution to achieving the pledges. For New Zealand, for instance, the potential contribution of future LULUCF credits may equal 33 % of its 1990 emission level. For Australia, the pledges are expressed relative to 2000 emission levels including LULUCF emissions. Given that LULUCF emissions have strongly declined between 1990 and 2000, and a further decline in foreseen by 2020 (based on Australia’s projections), the minimum contribution of LULUCF to meet the Australian pledges appears to be about 19 % and 7 % relative to its 1990 and 2000 emission level, respectively. A further 3 % potential contribution is estimated from additional actions.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 881
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [41] Agroforestry versus farm mosaic systems - Comparing land-use efficiency, economic returns and risks under climate change effects
    Paul, Carola
    Weber, Michael
    Knoke, Thomas
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 587 : 22 - 35
  • [42] Forest management can mitigate negative impacts of climate and land-use change on plant biodiversity: Insights from the Republic of Korea
    Choi, Yuyoung
    Lim, Chul-Hee
    Chung, Hye In
    Kim, Yoonji
    Cho, Hyo Jin
    Hwang, Jinhoo
    Kraxner, Florian
    Biging, Gregory S.
    Lee, Woo-Kyun
    Chon, Jinhyung
    Jeon, Seong Woo
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 288
  • [43] Non-carbon benefits as incentives for participation in REDD plus and the role of village participatory land use plans in supporting this: insights from Kilosa District, Tanzania
    Uisso, Amani J.
    Chirwa, Paxie W.
    Ackerman, Pierre A.
    Mbwambo, Lawrence
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 64 (06) : 1111 - 1132
  • [44] The role of spatial information in the preservation of the shrimp nursery function of mangroves: A spatially explicit bio-economic model for the assessment of land use trade-offs
    Zavalloni, Matteo
    Groeneveld, Rolf A.
    van Zwieten, Paul A. M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 143 : 17 - 25