The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges

被引:0
|
作者
Giacomo Grassi
Michel G. J. den Elzen
Andries F. Hof
Roberto Pilli
Sandro Federici
机构
[1] Joint Research Centre,European Commission
[2] Institute for Environment and Sustainability,Department of Climate, Air and Energy
[3] Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL),undefined
来源
Climatic Change | 2012年 / 115卷
关键词
Forest Management; Kyoto Protocol; Emission Level; Additional Action; Commitment Period;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Annex I Parties may receive credits or debits from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) activities, contributing to achieving individual emission reduction targets. In the Durban climate negotiations, Parties agreed new LULUCF accounting rules for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (CP2). By using these new rules, this paper presents key differences among Parties at the minimum (assuming no additional action) and potential (assuming additional actions) contribution of the forest-related LULUCF activities in achieving the pledges for 2020. Overall, the potential contribution of LULUCF is relatively modest (up to about 2 % of 1990 emissions) for the EU, the Annex I Parties likely joining the CP2, and for the Annex I Parties that joined the CP1 as a whole. However, for specific Parties, LULUCF can make a substantial contribution to achieving the pledges. For New Zealand, for instance, the potential contribution of future LULUCF credits may equal 33 % of its 1990 emission level. For Australia, the pledges are expressed relative to 2000 emission levels including LULUCF emissions. Given that LULUCF emissions have strongly declined between 1990 and 2000, and a further decline in foreseen by 2020 (based on Australia’s projections), the minimum contribution of LULUCF to meet the Australian pledges appears to be about 19 % and 7 % relative to its 1990 and 2000 emission level, respectively. A further 3 % potential contribution is estimated from additional actions.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 881
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges
    Grassi, Giacomo
    den Elzen, Michel G. J.
    Hof, Andries F.
    Pilli, Roberto
    Federici, Sandro
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 115 (3-4) : 873 - 881
  • [2] The treatment of land use, land use change and forestry in the post-2012 climate agreement: a perspective from non-Annex I Parties
    Federici, S.
    Galluzzi, G.
    IFOREST-BIOGEOSCIENCES AND FORESTRY, 2010, 3 : 56 - 58
  • [3] Analysing the levels of human-induced greenhouse gas emissions from land use, land use change and forestry activities on Annex I countries ability to meet Kyoto targets
    Maraseni, Tek Narayan
    Maroulis, Jerry
    Nooriafshar, Mehryar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2010, 42 (04) : 301 - 316
  • [4] Land-use change and forestry in the Kyoto protocol
    Bloomfield J.
    Ratchford M.
    Brown S.
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2000, 5 (1) : 3 - 8
  • [5] A synopsis of land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) under the Kyoto Protocol and Marrakech Accords
    Schlamadinger, B.
    Bird, N.
    Johns, T.
    Brown, S.
    Canadell, J.
    Ciccarese, L.
    Dutschke, M.
    Fiedler, J.
    Fischlin, A.
    Fearnside, P.
    Forner, C.
    Freibauer, A.
    Frumhoff, P.
    Hoehne, N.
    Kirschbaum, M. U. F.
    Labat, A.
    Marland, G.
    Michaelowa, A.
    Montanarella, L.
    Moutinho, P.
    Murdiyarso, D.
    Pena, N.
    Pingoud, K.
    Rakonczay, Z.
    Rametsteiner, E.
    Rock, J.
    Sanz, M. J.
    Schneider, U. A.
    Shuidenko, A.
    Skutsch, M.
    Smith, P.
    Somogyi, Z.
    Trines, E.
    Ward, M.
    Yamagata, Y.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2007, 10 (04) : 271 - 282
  • [6] The rules for land use, land use change and forestry under the Kyoto Protocol-lessons learned for the future climate negotiations
    Hoehne, Niklas
    Wartmann, Sina
    Herold, Anke
    Freibauer, Annette
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2007, 10 (04) : 353 - 369
  • [7] Land use, land-use change, forestry, and agricultural activities in the clean development mechanism: Estimates of greenhouse gas offset potential
    Bloomfield J.
    Pearson H.L.
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2000, 5 (1) : 9 - 24
  • [8] Revisiting the politics of expertise in light of the Kyoto negotiations on land use change and forestry
    Lovbrand, Eva
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2009, 11 (5-6) : 404 - 412
  • [9] Uncertainty in land-use change and forestry sector mitigation options for global warming: Plantation silviculture versus avoided deforestation
    Fearnside, PM
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2000, 18 (06) : 457 - 468
  • [10] Land use, land-use change and their effect on greenhouse gas emissions and removals from Greek forests
    Tzamtzis, Iordanis
    Ganatsas, Petros
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2020, 22 (01) : 111 - 131