Using bland-altman to assess agreement between two medical devices - Don't forget the confidence intervals!

被引：62

作者：

Hamilton C. ^{[1
]}

Stamey J. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA 92614, One Edwards Way

[2] Department of Statistical Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX

来源：

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | 2007年 / 21卷 / 6期

关键词：

Bland-Altman; Limits of agreement; Statistical agreement;

D O I：

10.1007/s10877-007-9092-x

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The limits of agreement approach of Bland and Altman is by far the most popular method for investigating statistical agreement between two measurement devices. This work presents the dangers of relying exclusively on the limits of agreement alone and argues that authors should always provide confidence intervals to assess the variability in the estimated limits. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007.

引用

页码：331 / 333

页数：2

共 6 条

[1]

Dawson D., Lygate C.A., Saunders J., Et al., Quantitative 3-dimensional echocardiography for accurate and rapid cardiac phenotype characterization in mice, Circulation, 110, 12, pp. 1632-1637, (2004)

[2]

Cabrera J.A., Sanchez-Quintana D., Farre J., Et al., Ultrasonic characterization of the pulmonary venous wall: Echographic and histological correlation, Circulation, 106, 8, pp. 968-973, (2002)

[3]

Bland J.M., Altman D.G., Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement, Lancet, 1, 8476, pp. 307-310, (1986)

[4]

Choudhary P.K., Nagaraja H.N., Measuring agreement in method comparison studies - A review, Advances in Ranking and Selection, Multiple Comparisons, and Reliability, pp. 215-244, (2005)

[5]

Ryan T.P., Woodall W.H., The most-cited statistical papers, J Appl Stat, 32, pp. 461-474, (2005)

[6]

In vitro diagnostic test systems - Requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus, (2003)

← 1 →