Corporate social responsibility, green credit, and corporate performance: an empirical analysis based on the mining, power, and steel industries of China

被引:0
作者
Lingyun He
Chen Wu
Xiaolei Yang
Jiao Liu
机构
[1] China University of Mining and Technology,School of Management
[2] Jiangsu International Energy Policy Research Center of Colleges and Universities,undefined
来源
Natural Hazards | 2019年 / 95卷
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Environmental information disclosure; Green credit; Corporate performance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
From the perspective of corporate social responsibility and environmental risk management, green credit will have an important impact on corporate performance. The influence of green credit policy on enterprises can be reflected by the borrowing ability and financing cost of the enterprises, which represent the support strength and price preference of green credit policy. Based on this, this paper considers data on long-term borrowing capacity, short-term borrowing capacity, corporate social responsibility report score, and assets’ return rate of 119 listed enterprises of mining, power, and steel industries in China, from 2010 to 2016, and uses a panel data model to estimates the general relationship between the corporate social responsibility, green credit, and corporate performance. We find that: First, taking the social responsibility can promote the enterprises’ long-term borrowing ability and reduce their financing cost, but it can inhibit their short-term borrowing ability. With a 1% improvement in corporate social responsibility score, the long-term borrowing ability of enterprises in three industries will be increased by 0.0867, 0.2688, and 0.0510%, respectively. Second, the positive undertaking of corporate social responsibility will promote the improvement in enterprise performance. The result of enterprise performance improvement for the sample industry is 0.05, 0.03, and 0.07%. Third, the long-term borrowing ability of enterprise green credit has a small promoting effect on the enterprises’ performance, with the coefficients being 0.1266, 0.0539, and 0.0306, respectively. This paper can be used as a reference to promote both implementation of green credit policy and corporate performance.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 89
页数:16
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Bharath ST(2008)Accounting quality and debt contracting Account Rev 83 1-28
[2]  
Sunder J(2011)Marketization process, environmental information disclosure and green credit Collect Essays Finance Econ 5 79-85
[3]  
Sunder SV(1999)Corporate social responsibility evolution of a Definitional construct Bus Soc 38 268-295
[4]  
Cai HJ(2010)The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice Int J Manage Rev 12 85-105
[5]  
Xu H(2008)Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical analysis Acc Organ Soc 33 303-327
[6]  
Carroll AB(2011)Erratum to: beyond acclamations and excuses: environmental performance, voluntary environmental disclosure and the role of visibility J Bus Ethics 99 383-397
[7]  
Carroll AB(2006)In practice, how good corporate reputations create corporate value Corp Reput Rev 9 134-143
[8]  
Shabana KM(2011)The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans J Bank Finance 35 1794-1810
[9]  
Clarkson PM(2003)Environmental finance: a guide to environmental risk assessment and financial products Transplantation 66 405-409
[10]  
Li Y(2005)Correctly understand “corporate social responsibility” Sci Decis Mak 3 20-21