Learning with ChatGPT 3.5 as a more knowledgeable other: an autoethnographic study

被引:0
作者
Ana Stojanov
机构
[1] University of Otago,Higher Education Development Centre
来源
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education | / 20卷
关键词
ChatGPT (ChatGPT 3.5); MKO (more knowledgeable other); Autoethnography; Higher education; Sociocultural theory; Human–computer interaction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence language model introduced in November 2022, is potentially applicable in many contexts, including higher education. Although academics are already using it to draft papers or develop search queries for systematic reviews, its use as a tool aiding the learning process has not been examined. To address this research gap, I conducted an autoethnographic study examining my experience using ChatGPT as a more knowledgeable other that scaffolded my learning about a particular topic—the technical aspects of how ChatGPT works. Overall, ChatGPT provided me with enough content to form a general idea of its technical aspects, and I experienced its feedback as motivating and relevant. However, the answers were somewhat superficial, the text it generated was not always consistent or logical and sometimes contradictory. The instantaneous replies to my questions contributed to an experience of a 'flow'. Being 'in the zone' also meant I overestimated my knowledge and understanding, as I could not detect the contradictory responses it provided 'on the spot'. I conclude that caution is advised when ChatGPT is used as a learning aid, as we learn more about its capabilities and limitations and how humans tend to perceive and interact with these technologies.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Blut M(2021)Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: A meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 49 632-658
[2]  
Wang C(2023)This new conversational AI model can be your friend, philosopher, and guide … and even your worst enemy Patterns. 4 100676-340
[3]  
Wünderlich NV(2023)Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT Innovations in Education and Teaching International 13 319-521
[4]  
Brock C(1989)Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology MIS Quarterly 53 103662-1134
[5]  
Chatterjee J(2023)ChatGPT for (Finance) research: The Bananarama Conjecture Finance Research Letters 20 511-498
[6]  
Dethlefs N(2013)The hypercorrection effect in younger and older adults Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition 77 1121-e108
[7]  
Cotton DRE(1999)Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognising one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments [Article] Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 108 480-192
[8]  
Cotton PA(1990)The case for motivated reasoning Psychological Bulletin 13 01003-393
[9]  
Shipway JR(2023)Can ChatGPT draft a research article? An example of population-level vaccine effectiveness analysis Journal of Global Health 5 e107-28
[10]  
Davis FD(2023)ChatGPT: The future of discharge summaries? The Lancet Digital Health 6 177-621