Cancer genetic testing panels for inherited cancer susceptibility: the clinical experience of a large adult genetics practice

被引:0
作者
Christina G. Selkirk
Kristen J. Vogel
Anna C. Newlin
Scott M. Weissman
Shelly M. Weiss
Chi-Hsiung Wang
Peter J. Hulick
机构
[1] NorthShore University HealthSystem,Center for Medical Genetics
[2] NorthShore University HealthSystem,Center for Biomedical and Research Informatics
来源
Familial Cancer | 2014年 / 13卷
关键词
Clinical molecular genetics; Familial and hereditary cancers; Massively-parallel sequencing; Other tumor suppressor genes; Genetic counseling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Next-generation sequencing genetic testing panels for cancer susceptibility (cancer panels) have recently become clinically available. At present, clinical utility is unknown and there are no set criteria or guidelines established for whom to offer such testing. Although it may be a cost-effective method to test multiple cancer susceptibility genes concurrently, the rate of finding variants of unknown significance (VUS) may be high and testing may yield mutations in genes with no established management recommendations. We describe our Center’s experience over a 14-month period (April 2012–June 2013) for patient interest and uptake in cancer panel testing and whether there were predictors of pursuing testing or identifying mutations. Using a clinical ranking system, patients’ family histories were ranked from 0 to 3 (low likelihood to high likelihood for underlying genetic susceptibility). The clinical ranking system was assessed to determine its predictability of finding mutations. Of the 689 patients who met inclusion criteria, the option of pursuing a cancer panel was discussed with 357 patients; 63 (17.6 %) patients pursued testing. Those who pursued testing were more likely to be older, male, affected with cancer, affected with multiple primary cancers, and had a higher clinical rank than non-pursuers. There were no significant predictors of finding a mutation on panel testing. Of the 61 patients who have received results, there was a 6.6 % mutation rate and 19.7 % VUS rate. The yield of cancer panels in clinical practice is low and the strength of family history alone may not predict likelihood of finding a mutation.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 536
页数:9
相关论文
共 176 条
[1]  
Domchek SM(2013)Multiplex genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: out on the high wire without a net? J Clin Oncol 31 1267-1270
[2]  
Bradbury A(2013)Disease-targeted sequencing: a cornerstone in the clinic Nat Rev Genet 14 295-300
[3]  
Garber JE(2013)Molecular genetic testing and the future of clinical genomics Nat Rev Genet 14 415-426
[4]  
Offit K(2012)Clinical application of exome sequencing in undiagnosed genetic conditions J Med Genet 49 353-361
[5]  
Robson ME(2010)Personalized genomic information: preparing for the future of genetic medicine Nat Rev Genet 11 161-165
[6]  
Rehm HL(2010)Detection of inherited mutations for breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture and massively parallel sequencing Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107 12629-12633
[7]  
Katsanis SH(2012)The predictive capacity of personal genome sequencing Sci Transl. Med 4 133ra58-80
[8]  
Katsanis N(2012)Molecular genetics of breast and ovarian cancer: recent advances and clinical implications Balkan. J Med Genet 15 75-5919
[9]  
Need AC(2006)The CHEK2 gene and inherited breast cancer susceptibility Oncogene 25 5912-472
[10]  
Shashi V(2013)Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA testing: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress Clin Genet 84 464-3685