Downscaling of real-time coastal flooding predictions for decision support

被引:0
作者
C. A. Rucker
N. Tull
J. C. Dietrich
T. E. Langan
H. Mitasova
B. O. Blanton
J. G. Fleming
R. A. Luettich
机构
[1] North Carolina State University,Dep’t of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering
[2] U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,Center for Geospatial Analytics
[3] University of Texas at Austin,Renaissance Computing Institute
[4] North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program,Institute of Marine Science
[5] NC Emergency Management,undefined
[6] North Carolina State University,undefined
[7] University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,undefined
[8] Seahorse Coastal Consulting,undefined
[9] University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,undefined
来源
Natural Hazards | 2021年 / 107卷
关键词
ADCIRC; Carteret County; GRASS GIS; North Carolina; Storm Surge;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
During coastal storms, forecasters and researchers use numerical models to predict the magnitude and extent of coastal flooding. These models must represent the large regions that may be affected by a storm, and thus, they can be computationally costly and may not use the highest geospatial resolution. However, predicted flood extents can be downscaled (by increasing resolution) as a post-processing step. Existing downscaling methods use either a static extrapolation of the flooding as a flat surface, or rely on subsequent simulations with nested, full-physics models at higher resolution. This research explores a middle way, in which the downscaling includes simplified physics to improve accuracy. Using results from a state-of-the-art model, we downscale its flood predictions with three methods: (1) static, in which the water surface elevations are extrapolated horizontally until they intersect the ground surface; (2) slopes, in which the gradient of the water surface is used; and (3) head loss, which accounts for energy losses due to land cover characteristics. The downscaling methods are then evaluated for forecasts and hindcasts of Hurricane Florence (2018), which caused widespread flooding in North Carolina. The static and slopes methods tend to over-estimate the flood extents. However, the head loss method generates a downscaled flooding extent that is a close match to the predictions from a higher-resolution, full-physics model. These results are encouraging for the use of these downscaling methods to support decision-making during coastal storms.
引用
收藏
页码:1341 / 1369
页数:28
相关论文
共 278 条
[1]  
Aerts JCJH(2013)Low-probability flood risk modeling for New York City Risk Anal 33 772-778
[2]  
Lin N(2000)A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation J Hydrol 236 54-77
[3]  
Botzen WJW(2005)Simplified two-dimensional numerical modelling of coastal flooding and example applications Coast Eng 52 793-810
[4]  
Emanuel K(2012)Urgent computing of storm surge for North Carolina’s coast Proc Int Conf Comput Sci 9 1677-1686
[5]  
de Moel H(2015)Street-scale modeling of storm surge inundation along the New Jersey Hudson River waterfront Jo Atmos Ocean Technol 32 1486-1497
[6]  
Bates PD(1999)A third-generation wave model for coastal regions, Part I, Model description and validation J Geophys Res 104 7649-7666
[7]  
de Roo APJ(2006)Modelling future landscape change on coastal floodplains using a rule-based GIS Environ Model Softw 21 1479-1490
[8]  
Bates PD(2010)A high-resolution coupled riverine flow, tide, wind, wind wave and storm surge model for southern Louisiana and Mississippi: Part I - Model development and validation Mon Weather Rev 138 345-377
[9]  
Dawson RJ(2003)Modeling of storm-induced coastal flooding for emergency management Ocean Eng 30 1353-1386
[10]  
Hall JW(2017)Development of high-resolution multi-scale modelling system for simulation of coastal-fluvial urban flooding Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 17 205-224