Tweeting nano: how public discourses about nanotechnology develop in social media environments

被引:0
作者
Kristin K. Runge
Sara K. Yeo
Michael Cacciatore
Dietram A. Scheufele
Dominique Brossard
Michael Xenos
Ashley Anderson
Doo-hun Choi
Jiyoun Kim
Nan Li
Xuan Liang
Maria Stubbings
Leona Yi-Fan Su
机构
[1] University of Wisconsin,Department of Life Sciences Communication
[2] University of Wisconsin,Department of Communication Arts
来源
Journal of Nanoparticle Research | 2013年 / 15卷
关键词
Nanotechnology; Social media; Twitter; Public opinion; Online; Policy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The growing popularity of social media as a channel for distributing and debating scientific information raises questions about the types of discourse that surround emerging technologies, such as nanotechnology, in online environments, as well as the different forms of information that audiences encounter when they use these online tools of information sharing. This study maps the landscape surrounding social media traffic about nanotechnology. Specifically, we use computational linguistic software to analyze a census of all English-language nanotechnology-related tweets expressing opinions posted on Twitter between September 1, 2010 and August 31, 2011. Results show that 55 % of tweets expressed certainty and 45 % expressed uncertainty. Twenty-seven percent of tweets expressed optimistic outlooks, 32 % expressed neutral outlooks and 41 % expressed pessimistic outlooks. Tweets were mapped by U.S. state, and our data show that tweets are more likely to originate from states with a federally funded National Nanotechnology Initiative center or network. The trend toward certainty in opinion coupled with the distinct geographic origins of much of the social media traffic on Twitter for nanotechnology-related opinion has significant implications for understanding how key online influencers are debating and positioning the issue of nanotechnology for lay and policy audiences.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Anderson AA(2010)The changing information environment for nanotechnology: online audiences and content J Nanopart Res 12 1083-1094
  • [2] Brossard D(1996)R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production Am Econ Rev 86 630-640
  • [3] Scheufele DA(2002)Public attitudes toward nanotechnology J Nanopart Res 4 561-570
  • [4] Audretsch DB(2004)Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change Mass commun soc 7 359-377
  • [5] Feldman MP(2009)Religiosity as a perceptual filter: examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology Public Underst Sci 18 546-558
  • [6] Bainbridge WS(2012)Coverage of emerging technologies: a comparison between print and online media New Media Soc 14 1039-1059
  • [7] Brossard D(2011)Negative emotions boost users activity at BBC Forum Phys A Stat Mech Appl 90 2936-2944
  • [8] Shanahan J(2011)Twitter revolutions? Addressing social media and dissent Commun Rev 14 155-157
  • [9] McComas K(2004)Public perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits and trust J Nanopart Res 6 395-405
  • [10] Brossard D(2011)Food nanotechnology in the news: coverage patterns and thematic emphases during the last decade Appetite 56 78-89