Incorporating Choice-Making Opportunities to Increase Engagement in Leisure Activities for Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

被引:0
作者
Casey J. Clay
Nelungwe Chuunga
Karen V. O’Connor
SungWoo Kahng
机构
[1] Thompson Autism and Neurodevelopmental Center at Children’s Health of Orange County,
[2] University of Missouri,undefined
[3] Trinity Christian College,undefined
[4] Rutgers University,undefined
来源
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities | 2024年 / 36卷
关键词
Adults; Choice; Developmental disability; Intellectual disability; Preference assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A growing number of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) attend day programming. These programs are designed to give consumers the opportunity to explore the community, socialize with community members, and to engage in community activities. Unfortunately, activities offered may be selected by program staff without much input from the day program participants. Researchers examined the use of video-based paired stimulus preference assessments (VPA) to identify potentially preferred activities for three adults with IDD in a day program setting. Participant engagement levels during identified preferred activities were compared with staff-selected activities. Consistent with previous research, researchers were able to identify a hierarchy of preferred activities using the VPA. Researchers found preferred activities identified by the VPA maintained more engagement than staff-selected activities for all three participants. Our findings suggest VPA may be beneficial to incorporate into daily activity planning for adults with IDD in day programs.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 344
页数:15
相关论文
共 189 条
[1]  
Bannerman DJ(1990)Balancing the right to habilitation with the right to personal liberties: The rights of people with developmental disabilities to eat too many doughnuts and take a nap Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 23 79-89
[2]  
Sheldon JB(2019)Providing support for decision making to adults with intellectual disability: Perspectives of family members and workers in disability support services Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 44 396-409
[3]  
Sherman JA(2017)Using videos to assess preference for novel stimuli in children with autism Developmental Neurorehabilitation 20 560-564
[4]  
Harchik AE(2017)Further refinement of video-based brief multiple‐stimulus without replacement preference assessments Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 50 170-175
[5]  
Bigby C(2019)Further examination of video-based preference assessments without contingent access Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 52 258-270
[6]  
Whiteside M(2018)Considerations for preference and reinforcer assessments with older adults with developmental disabilities Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice 18 103-188
[7]  
Douglas J(2020)A meta-analysis of interventions to promote self-determination for students with disabilities Remedial and Special Education 41 176-34
[8]  
Brodhead MT(2017)Employment and choice-making for adults with intellectual disability, autism, and down syndrome Research in Developmental Disabilities 65 23-15
[9]  
Rispoli MJ(2005)Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: A review of the literature Research in Developmental Disabilities 26 1-226
[10]  
Brodhead MT(2015)Increasing the efficiency of paired?stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 48 221-453