Early detection of recurrence by 18FDG-PET in the follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer

被引:0
作者
I Sobhani
E Tiret
R Lebtahi
T Aparicio
E Itti
F Montravers
C Vaylet
P Rougier
T André
J M Gornet
D Cherqui
C Delbaldo
Y Panis
J N Talbot
M Meignan
D Le Guludec
机构
[1] Université Paris 12 et Hôpital Henri Mondor,
[2] 51 Av du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny,undefined
[3] Hôpital Saint Antoine,undefined
[4] Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard,undefined
[5] Hôpital Tenon,undefined
[6] Hôpital Ambroise Paré,undefined
[7] Hôpital Saint Louis,undefined
[8] Hôpital Lariboisière,undefined
[9] Paris 75010,undefined
[10] AP-HP,undefined
[11] France,undefined
来源
British Journal of Cancer | 2008年 / 98卷
关键词
FDG PET; CT scan; colon cancer; follow up;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We assessed the potential benefits of including systematic 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for detecting tumour recurrence in a prospective randomised trial. Patients (N=130) who had undergone curative therapy were randomised to undergo either conventional (Con) or FDG-PET procedures during follow-up. The two groups were matched at baseline. Recurrence was confirmed histologically. ‘Intention-to-treat’ analysis revealed a recurrence in 46 patients (25 in the FDG-PET group, and 21 in the Con group; P=0.50), whereas per protocol analysis revealed a recurrence in 44 out of 125 patients (23 and 21, respectively; P=0.60). In another three cases, PET revealed unexpected tumours (one gastric GIST, two primary pulmonary cancers). Three false-positive cases of FDG-PET led to no beneficial procedures (two laparoscopies and one liver MRI that were normal). We failed to identify peritoneal carcinomatosis in two of the patients undergoing FDG-PET. The overall time in detecting a recurrence from the baseline was not significantly different in the two groups. However, recurrences were detected after a shorter time (12.1 vs 15.4 months; P=0.01) in the PET group, in which recurrences were also more frequently (10 vs two patients) cured by surgery (R0). Regular FDG-PET monitoring in the follow up of colorectal cancer patients may permit the earlier detection of recurrence, and influence therapy strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 880
页数:5
相关论文
共 176 条
  • [1] Benoist S(2006)Complete response of colorectal liver metastases after chemotherapy: does it mean cure? J Clin Oncol 24 3939-3945
  • [2] Brouquet A(2003)Direct comparison of (18)F-FDG PET and PET/CT in patients with colorectal carcinoma J Nucl Med 44 1797-1803
  • [3] Penna C(2005)Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline J Clin Oncol 23 8512-8519
  • [4] Julie C(2004)Detection of recurrence in patients with rectal cancer: PET/CT after abdominoperineal or anterior resection Radiology 232 815-822
  • [5] El Hajjam M(2004)Five-year survival after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer in patients screened by positron emission tomography with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) Ann Surg 240 438-447
  • [6] Chagnon S(2003)Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: a practice guideline BMC Cancer 3 26-946
  • [7] Mitry E(1997)Liver resection for colorectal metastases J Clin Oncol 15 938-35
  • [8] Rougier P(1998)Surgery for recurrent colon cancer: strategies for identifying resectable recurrence and success rates after resection. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, the North Central Cancer Treatment Group, and the Southwest Oncology Group Ann Intern Med 129 27-2324
  • [9] Nordlinger B(1987)Predictors of survival after curative resection of carcinoma of the colon and rectum Cancer 60 2318-901
  • [10] Cohade C(2006)The role of carcinoembryonic antigen as a predictor of the need for preoperative computed tomography in colon cancer patients Am Surg 72 897-668