Relationship between self-reported disability and functional capacity in patients with Whiplash Associated Disorder

被引:0
作者
Suzan van der Meer
Michiel F. Reneman
Jan Verhoeven
Job van der Palen
机构
[1] University of Twente,Department of Research Methodology, Measurement and Data Analysis
[2] University Medical Center Groningen,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation
[3] University of Groningen,Department of Epidemiology
[4] Condite,undefined
[5] Disability Management,undefined
[6] Medisch Spectrum Twente,undefined
来源
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | 2014年 / 24卷
关键词
Whiplash injuries; Neck pain; Chronic pain; Sick leave; Disability evaluation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Patients with chronic Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD) report symptoms and disability. Neither the relationship between self-reported disability and functional capacity, nor its predictors have been investigated in patients with WAD. This was the purpose of this study. Method This was a cross-sectional study. Participants were patients with WAD on sick leave. Self-reported disability was assessed with the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Functional capacity was assessed with a six-item neck functional capacity evaluation (FCE). Correlation coefficients were used to express the relationship between NDI (total and items) and FCE. Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of NDI and FCE. Results Forty patients were measured, of whom 18 (45 %) were male. Mean age was 33 years, median duration of complaints was 12 months, and 75 % had a pending insurance claim. Correlations between NDI and FCE tests varied from −0.39 to −0.70. Independent predictors of NDI were pain intensity and a pending claim, explaining 43 % of the variance. Independent predictors of FCE were NDI, gender, and pain intensity, explaining 20–55 % of the variance. Conclusions Self-reported disability and functional capacity are related but different. Both can part be predicted by pain intensity. A pending claim can predict higher self-reported disability. Both constructs are complementary and are recommended to determine disability in patients with WAD comprehensively.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 424
页数:5
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Stovner LJ(1996)The nosologic status of the whiplash syndrome: a critical review based on a methodological approach Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21 2735-2746
[2]  
Pearce JMS(1999)A critical appraisal of the chronic whiplash syndrome J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 66 273-276
[3]  
Soer R(2009)Normative values for a functional capacity evaluation Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90 1785-1794
[4]  
van der Schans CP(2009)Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 39 400-417
[5]  
Geertzen JH(2005)Comparing self-report, clinical examination and functional testing in the assessment of work-related limitations in patients with chronic low back pain Disabil Rehabil 27 999-1005
[6]  
Groothoff JW(2008)Relationship between psychological factors and performance-based and self-reported disability in chronic low back pain Eur Spine J 17 1448-1456
[7]  
Brouwer S(2003)Physical functioning: self-report and performance measures are related but distinct Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 2407-2413
[8]  
Dijkstra PU(2009)Self-reported functional status as predictor of observed functional capacity in subjects with early osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: a diagnostic study in the CHECK cohort J Occup Rehabil 19 345-353
[9]  
MacDermid JC(2012)Neck pain and disability scale and neck disability index: validity of dutch language versions Eur Spine J 21 93-100
[10]  
Walton DM(1995)Scientific monograph of the Quebec task force on whiplash-associated disorders: redefining “whiplash” and its management Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20 1S-73S